首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Molecules >Comparison and Identification of the Aroma-Active Compounds in the Root of Angelica dahurica
【2h】

Comparison and Identification of the Aroma-Active Compounds in the Root of Angelica dahurica

机译:当归根中香气活性化合物的比较与鉴定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME), purge and trap (P&T), stir bar sportive extraction (SBSE), and dynamic headspace sampling (DHS) were applied to extract, separate and analyze the volatile compounds in the roots of Hangbaizhi, Qibaizhi, and Bobaizhi and the GC-O-MS/MS (AEDA) was utilized for the quantification of key aroma compounds. Totals of 52, 54, and 43 aroma-active compounds extracted from the three samples by the four extraction methods were identified. Among these methods, the SPME effectively extracted the aroma compounds from the . Thus, using the SPME methods for quantitative analysis based on external standards and subsequent dilution analyses, totals of 20, 21, and 17 aroma compounds were detected in the three samples by the sniffing test, and sensory evaluations indicated that the aromas of included herb, spice, and woody. Finally, principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the three kinds formed three separate groups, and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) showed that caryophyllene, (−)-β-elemene, nonanal, and β-pinene played an important role in the classification of .
机译:应用固相微萃取(SPME),吹扫捕集(P&T),搅拌棒体育萃取(SBSE)和动态顶空进样(DHS)来萃取,分离和分析杭柏芝,祁柏芝和香根草根中的挥发性化合物。博柏芝和GC-O-MS / MS(AEDA)用于定量关键香气化合物。鉴定了通过四种提取方法从三个样品中提取的总共52、54和43种芳香活性化合物。在这些方法中,SPME有效地从中提取香气化合物。因此,使用SPME方法根据外标进行定量分析,然后进行稀释度分析,通过嗅探测试在三个样品中总共检测到20、21和17种香气化合物,感官评估表明所含草药的香气,香料和木本味。最后,主成分分析(PCA)表明这三种形成了三个独立的组,偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)表明石竹烯,(-)-β-榄香烯,壬醛和β-pine烯起着重要的作用。在分类中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号