首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Superior Sensitivity and Decreased Time to Detection with the Bactec Peds Plus/F System Compared to the BacT/Alert Pediatric FAN Blood Culture System
【2h】

Superior Sensitivity and Decreased Time to Detection with the Bactec Peds Plus/F System Compared to the BacT/Alert Pediatric FAN Blood Culture System

机译:与BacT / Alert儿童FAN血液培养系统相比Bactec Peds Plus / F系统具有更高的灵敏度和更少的检测时间

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Here, we compare the sensitivities and times to detection (TTD) of BacT/Alert Pediatric FAN (PF) and Bactec Peds Plus blood culture bottles. Test bottles were inoculated with 2 ml of banked whole blood, 1-ml aliquots of antibiotic suspension, and organisms diluted to simulate a bacteremia level of 10 to 100 CFU/ml. The control bottles were inoculated with 3 ml of banked blood and organism suspensions only. The organism-drug combinations were Staphylococcus epidermidis and vancomycin, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin, Streptococcus pneumoniae, vancomycin, and ceftriaxone, Streptococcus agalactiae, ampicillin, and cefotaxime, Escherichia coli, cefotaxime, and cefepime, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, and gentamicin, Neisseria meningitidis and ceftriaxone, and Haemophilus influenzae and ceftriaxone. The control and test bottle combinations were tested in duplicate. The bottles were incubated for 5 days; 32 control and 104 test bottles were incubated. Overall, the bacterial recovery rates for the PF and Peds Plus bottles were 37% and 62%, 94% and 100% in the controls, 19% and 50% in the test bottles, and 33% and 92% in the bottles with vancomycin, respectively. No bacteria were recovered from the bottles with S. pneumoniae, S. agalactiae, E. coli, N. meningitidis, or H. influenzae in combination with cefotaxime or ceftriaxone. The Peds Plus system detected P. aeruginosa in bottles with cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam, but the PF system recovered bacteria only in bottles with trough levels of piperacillin-tazobactam. The mean TTD were shorter in the Peds Plus system controls (14.2 versus 18.0 h; P = 0.001) and the test bottles (14.3 versus 17.8 h; P = 0.008) than in the PF bottles. Overall, we demonstrated superior sensitivity, TTD, and antibiotic neutralization in the Bactec Peds Plus system compared to those in the Pediatric FAN system.
机译:在这里,我们比较了BacT / Alert Pediatric FAN(PF)和Bactec Peds Plus血液培养瓶的检测灵敏度(TTD)和检测时间(TTD)。用2 ml储备的全血,1 ml等分的抗生素悬浮液和稀释后的生物体对模拟的细菌菌血症水平10到100 CFU / ml进行接种。对照瓶仅接种3 ml的血液和生物悬浮液。该生物-药物组合为表皮葡萄球菌和万古霉素,耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌和万古霉素,肺炎链球菌,万古霉素和头孢曲松,无乳链球菌,氨苄青霉素和头孢噻肟,头孢噻肟,哌替啶,埃塞奇霉素,大肠埃希菌,头孢吡肟,庆大霉素,脑膜炎奈瑟菌和头孢曲松,以及流感嗜血杆菌和头孢曲松。对照瓶和测试瓶的组合一式两份进行测试。将瓶子孵育5天;温育32个对照瓶和104个测试瓶。总体而言,PF和Peds Plus瓶的细菌回收率在对照组中分别为37%和62%,94%和100%,在测试瓶中为19%和50%,在装有万古霉素的瓶中为33%和92% , 分别。从肺炎链球菌,无乳链球菌,大肠杆菌,脑膜炎奈瑟氏球菌或流感嗜血杆菌与头孢噻肟或头孢曲松联合使用的瓶中未发现细菌。 Peds Plus系统在含有头孢吡肟和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦的瓶子中检测到了铜绿假单胞菌,但是PF系统仅在谷胱甘肽-他唑巴坦水平处于低谷的瓶子中回收了细菌。与PF瓶相比,Peds Plus系统对照组(14.2 vs 18.0 h; P = 0.001)和测试瓶(14.3 vs 17.8 h; P = 0.008)的平均TTD短。总体而言,与小儿FAN系统相比,Bactec Peds Plus系统具有更高的灵敏度,TTD和抗生素中和作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号