首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Personalized Treatment Suggestions: The Validity and Applicability of the Risk-Prevention-Index Social in Low Back Pain Exercise Treatments
【2h】

Personalized Treatment Suggestions: The Validity and Applicability of the Risk-Prevention-Index Social in Low Back Pain Exercise Treatments

机译:个性化治疗建议:下腰痛运动治疗中预防风险指数社交的有效性和适用性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The back pain screening tool Risk-Prevention- ndex ocial (RPI-S) identifies the individual psychosocial risk for low back pain chronification and supports the allocation of patients at risk in additional multidisciplinary treatments. The study objectives were to evaluate (1) the prognostic validity of the RPI-S for a 6-month time frame and (2) the clinical benefit of the RPI-S. In a multicenter single-blind 3-armed randomized controlled trial, = 660 persons (age 18–65 years) were randomly assigned to a twelve-week uni- or multidisciplinary exercise intervention or control group. Psychosocial risk was assessed by the RPI-S domain social environment (RPI-S ) and the outcome pain by the Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire (baseline M1, 12-weeks M4, 24-weeks M5). Prognostic validity was quantified by the root mean squared error (RMSE) within the control group. The clinical benefit of RPI-S was calculated by repeated measures ANOVA in intervention groups. A subsample of = 274 participants (mean = 38.0 years, SD 13.1) was analyzed, of which 30% were classified at risk in their psychosocial profile. The half-year prognostic validity was good (RMSE for disability of 9.04 at M4 and of 9.73 at M5; RMSE for pain intensity of 12.45 at M4 and of 14.49 at M5). People at risk showed significantly stronger reduction in pain disability and intensity at M4/M5, if participating in a multidisciplinary exercise treatment. Subjects at no risk showed a smaller reduction in pain disability in both interventions and no group differences for pain intensity. Regarding disability due to pain, around 41% of the sample would gain an unfitted treatment without the back pain screening. The RPI-S prognostic validity demonstrated good applicability and a clinical benefit confirmed by a clear advantage of an individualized treatment possibility.
机译:背痛筛查工具风险预防指数(RPI-S)可以识别出低背痛发作时间的个体社会心理风险,并支持在其他多学科治疗中分配有风险的患者。研究目的是评估(1)RPI-S在6个月的时间范围内的预后有效性,以及(2)RPI-S的临床益处。在多中心单盲三臂随机对照试验中,将660人(年龄18-65岁)随机分配到12周的单学科或多学科运动干预或对照组。通过RPI-S领域社交环境(RPI-S)评估社会心理风险,并通过慢性疼痛等级问卷(基线M1、12周M4、24周M5)评估结局疼痛。通过对照组内的均方根误差(RMSE)量化预后有效性。 RPI-S的临床获益通过干预组的重复测量ANOVA进行计算。分析了274名参与者(平均= 38.0岁,SD 13.1)的子样本,其中30%的心理社会特征被归类为处于危险中。半年的预后有效性良好(RMSE在M4为9.04,M5为9.73; RMSE在M4为12.45,在M5为14.49)。如果参加多学科运动治疗,处于危险中的人表现出在M4 / M5时疼痛残疾和强度的降低明显更强。没有危险的受试者在两种干预中均显示出较小的疼痛残疾减轻,并且疼痛强度没有组间差异。关于因疼痛而造成的残疾,大约有41%的样本无需进行背部疼痛筛查即可获得不合适的治疗。 RPI-S的预后有效性显示出良好的适用性,并通过个体化治疗可能性的明显优势证实了其临床益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号