首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Animal Science >PSI-16 Exploring the relationship between digesta retention time in the equine gastrointestinal tract and compartment models.
【2h】

PSI-16 Exploring the relationship between digesta retention time in the equine gastrointestinal tract and compartment models.

机译:PSI-16探索马消化道中消化物保留时间与隔室模型之间的关系。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Digesta retention time within specific segments of the equine gastrointestinal tract (GIT) may be more relevant to scientific inquiries than total tract mean retention time (TTMRT); however, measuring retention time in individual segments requires access to the digestive tract, either through GIT fistulas or via terminal studies. The objective of this study was to compare MRT in the foregut, cecum, and colon to model-derived compartment MRT. After a 10-d adaptation, a cannulated gelding was fed indigestible particulate and liquid markers to determine TTMRT. The gelding was dosed with different pairs of particulate and liquid markers into the cecum to determine hindgut MRT (HGMRT) and into the right ventral colon through the cecocolic orifice to measure large colon MRT (LCMRT). Fecal samples were composited in 2-h intervals for the first 60 h and 4-h intervals from 64 to 84 h post dose. The procedure was repeated 4 times over 60 d for 4 measurements of TTMRT, HGMRT, and LCMRT. Fecal marker concentrations were fit to stochastic and deterministic models using nonlinear least squares (MATLAB). Algebraic MRT and compartment MRT were compared using paired t-test (SAS) for each GIT segment and model. For liquid and particulate makers, the deterministic model TTMRT (17.5 ± 1.5 vs. 26.3 ± 1.8 h) differed ( = 0.007 vs. = 0.051) from algebraic TTMRT (29.0 ± 1.7 vs. 34.4 ± 3.7 h). Stochastic model exponential compartment MRT (5.8 ± 1.0 vs. 5.0 ± 0.4 h) were similar to foregut MRT (TTMRT – HGMRT; 7.4 ± 2.0 vs. 7.3 ± 0.9 h), but no similarities were observed between other compartment MRT and HGMRT or LCMRT. In these exploratory data, compartment retention times failed to pair with MRT in GIT segments. Significant methodological and analytical challenges remain to determine retention time in individual segments of the equine GIT.
机译:马胃肠道(GIT)特定区域内的消化道保留时间与科学查询的关系可能比总道平均保留时间(TTMRT)更重要。但是,要测量各个部分的保留时间,需要通过GIT瘘管或通过终末检查进入消化道。这项研究的目的是比较前肠,盲肠和结肠中的MRT与模型来源的隔室MRT。适应10天后,将插管的凝胶喂入难消化的颗粒和液体标记物,以测定TTMRT。用不同对的颗粒和液体标记物对胶凝剂进行剂量测定,将其注入盲肠以确定后肠MRT(HGMRT),并通过盲肠小孔注入右腹结肠以测量大结肠MRT(LCMRT)。在给药后的64至84小时内,在最初的60小时和4小时内以2小时的间隔混合粪便样品。在60 d内重复该过程4次,进行4次TTMRT,HGMRT和LCMRT测量。使用非线性最小二乘法(MATLAB)将粪便标记物浓度拟合到随机和确定性模型。对于每个GIT段和模型,使用配对t检验(SAS)比较了代数MRT和区室MRT。对于液体和颗粒物制造商,确定性模型TTMRT(17.5±1.5 vs. 26.3±1.8 h)与代数TTMRT(29.0±1.7 vs. 34.4±3.7 h)不同(= 0.007 vs. = 0.051)。随机模型指数隔室MRT(5.8±1.0 vs. 5.0±0.4 h)与前肠MRT(TTMRT – HGMRT; 7.4±2.0 vs. 7.3±0.9 h)类似,但其他隔室MRT与HGMRT或LCMRT之间没有相似之处。在这些探索性数据中,间隔保留时间未能与GIT段中的MRT配对。在确定马GIT各个部分的保留时间方面,仍然存在重大的方法和分析挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号