首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Multicenter Comparative Evaluation of Five Commercial Methods for Toxoplasma DNA Extraction from Amniotic Fluid
【2h】

Multicenter Comparative Evaluation of Five Commercial Methods for Toxoplasma DNA Extraction from Amniotic Fluid

机译:羊水中弓形虫DNA提取的五种商业方法的多中心比较评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Over the past few years, a number of new nucleic acid extraction methods and extraction platforms using chemistry combined with magnetic or silica particles have been developed, in combination with instruments to facilitate the extraction procedure. The objective of the present study was to investigate the suitability of these automated methods for the isolation of Toxoplasma gondii DNA from amniotic fluid (AF). Therefore, three automated procedures were compared to two commercialized manual extraction methods. The MagNA Pure Compact (Roche), BioRobot EZ1 (Qiagen), and easyMAG (bioMérieux) automated procedures were compared to two manual DNA extraction kits, the QIAamp DNA minikit (Qiagen) and the High Pure PCR template preparation kit (Roche). Evaluation was carried out with two specific Toxoplasma PCRs (targeting the 529-bp repeat element), inhibitor search PCRs, and human beta-globin PCRs. The samples each consisted of 4 ml of AF with or without a calibrated Toxoplasma gondii RH strain suspension (0, 1, 2.5, 5, and 25 tachyzoites/ml). All PCR assays were laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays, using either TaqMan or fluorescent resonance energy transfer probes. A total of 1,178 PCRs were performed, including 978 Toxoplasma PCRs. The automated and manual methods were similar in sensitivity for DNA extraction from T. gondii at the highest concentration (25 Toxoplasma gondii cells/ml). However, our results showed that the DNA extraction procedures led to variable efficacy in isolating low concentrations of tachyzoites in AF samples (<5 Toxoplasma gondii cells/ml), a difference that might have repercussions since low parasite concentrations in AF exist and can lead to congenital toxoplasmosis.
机译:在过去的几年中,已经开发了许多新的核酸提取方法和提取平台,这些方法和化学方法结合了磁性或二氧化硅颗粒,并结合了促进提取程序的仪器。本研究的目的是研究从羊水(AF)分离弓形虫DNA的自动化方法的适用性。因此,将三种自动化程序与两种商业化的手动提取方法进行了比较。将MagNA Pure Compact(Roche),BioRobot EZ1(Qiagen)和easyMAG(bioMérieux)自动化程序与两种手动DNA提取试剂盒,QIAamp DNA minikit(Qiagen)和High Pure PCR模板制备试剂盒(Roche)进行了比较。用两个特定的弓形虫PCR(靶向529bp重复元件),抑制剂搜索PCR和人β-珠蛋白PCR进行评估。每个样品由4 ml AF组成,有或没有校准的弓形虫RH菌株悬浮液(0、1、2.5、5和25速殖子/ ml)。使用TaqMan或荧光共振能量转移探针,所有PCR分析都是实验室开发的实时PCR分析。总共进行了1,178次PCR,其中包括978次弓形虫PCR。自动和手动方法在最高浓度(25个弓形虫细胞/ ml)中从弓形虫DNA提取中的敏感性相似。但是,我们的结果表明,DNA提取程序在分离AF样品中的低浓度速殖子(<5弓形虫细胞/ ml)方面具有可变的功效,这种差异可能会产生影响,因为AF中存在低的寄生虫浓度并可能导致先天性弓形虫病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号