首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Tunnelled Haemodialysis Catheter Removal: An Underappreciated Problem Not Always Simple and Safe
【2h】

Tunnelled Haemodialysis Catheter Removal: An Underappreciated Problem Not Always Simple and Safe

机译:隧道式血液透析导管的拆除:一个未被充分认识的问题并不总是简单和安全的

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Optimal care of patients treated with a central tunneled catheter (CTC) as vascular access for hemodialysis requires a number of procedures. One of them is CTC removal, usually carried out using mostly the cut-down method (CDM) and the traction method (TM). The procedure seems to be simple and safe; however, occasionally, serious complications may occur. To eliminate the risk of such events, we have introduced a modified cut-down method (MCDM). Methods: The study included the analysis of retrospective results of 143 CTC removal procedures, 76 of which were performed using the standard cut-down method (CDM), and in 67 cases, the modified cut-down method (MCDM) was applied. Results: As minor side effects occurred in patients treated with both methods with comparable frequency, serious complications were observed only in the CDM patients group. Conclusions: In our opinion, the new MCDM procedure is the simplest and safest method of CTC removal.
机译:背景:由于血液透析的血管通路需要许多程序,因此需要对使用中央隧道导管(CTC)治疗的患者进行最佳护理。其中之一是四氯化碳的去除,通常大部分采用切分法(CDM)和牵引法(TM)进行。该过程似乎简单安全。但是,偶尔会发生严重的并发症。为了消除此类事件的风险,我们引入了一种改进的缩减方法(MCDM)。方法:该研究包括对143例CTC去除程序的回顾性结果的分析,其中76例使用标准切除方法(CDM)进行,在67例病例中,采用了改良的切除方法(MCDM)。结果:由于两种方法治疗的患者发生副反应的频率均较小,因此仅在CDM患者组中观察到严重并发症。结论:我们认为,新的MCDM程序是去除CTC的最简单,最安全的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号