首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >Integrating quantitative and qualitative data and findings when undertaking randomised controlled trials
【2h】

Integrating quantitative and qualitative data and findings when undertaking randomised controlled trials

机译:进行随机对照试验时要整合定量和定性的数据和发现

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is common to undertake qualitative research alongside randomised controlled trials (RCTs) when evaluating complex interventions. Researchers tend to analyse these datasets one by one and then consider their findings separately within the discussion section of the final report, rarely integrating quantitative and qualitative data or findings, and missing opportunities to combine data in order to add rigour, enabling thorough and more complete analysis, provide credibility to results, and generate further important insights about the intervention under evaluation. This paper reports on a 2 day expert meeting funded by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council Hubs for Trials Methodology Research with the aims to identify current strengths and weaknesses in the integration of quantitative and qualitative methods in clinical trials, establish the next steps required to provide the trials community with guidance on the integration of mixed methods in RCTs and set-up a network of individuals, groups and organisations willing to collaborate on related methodological activity. We summarise integration techniques and go beyond previous publications by highlighting the potential value of integration using three examples that are specific to RCTs. We suggest that applying mixed methods integration techniques to data or findings from studies involving both RCTs and qualitative research can yield insights that might be useful for understanding variation in outcomes, the mechanism by which interventions have an impact, and identifying ways of tailoring therapy to patient preference and type. Given a general lack of examples and knowledge of these techniques, researchers and funders will need future guidance on how to undertake and appraise them.
机译:在评估复杂的干预措施时,通常会与随机对照试验(RCT)一起进行定性研究。研究人员倾向于逐一分析这些数据集,然后在最终报告的讨论部分中分别考虑其发现,很少整合定量和定性的数据或发现,并且缺少合并数据以增加严谨性的机会,从而能够进行更彻底和更完整的研究。分析,提供结果可信度以及对评估中的干预措施产生进一步的重要见解。本文在由英国医学研究理事会试验方法学研究中心资助的为期2天的专家会议上进行了报告,目的是确定在临床试验中定量和定性方法整合的当前优缺点,确定下一步需要提供的步骤在RCT中将混合方法集成的指导下,在试验社区中建立一个愿意就相关方法活动进行协作的个人,团体和组织网络。我们通过使用特定于RCT的三个示例来突出集成的潜在价值,来总结集成技术,并超越以前的出版物。我们建议,将混合方法集成技术应用于涉及RCT和定性研​​究的数据或研究结果可以产生见解,这些见解可能有助于理解结果的差异,干预产生影响的机制以及确定针对患者量身定制治疗方法的方法。偏好和类型。由于普遍缺乏这些技术的实例和知识,研究人员和资助者将需要有关如何进行和评估它们的未来指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号