首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Differences in Fourth-Graders Participation Rates Across Four School-Based Nutrition Studies
【2h】

Differences in Fourth-Graders Participation Rates Across Four School-Based Nutrition Studies

机译:在四项基于学校的营养学研究中四年级学生的参与率存在差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Federal policy has encouraged researchers to include children in research studies; thus, it is important to report experiences recruiting children to participate in studies. This article compares fourth-graders' participation rates across four school-based nutrition studies conducted in one school district in a southeastern state. For each study, children were observed eating school meals (breakfast and lunch); interviewed regarding dietary intake; and weighed and measured. For Study 1, children from 11 schools received $10 per interview for up to two interviews conducted in the morning at school. For Study 2, children from 10 schools received $25 if interviewed once in the evening, either by telephone or in a van parked outside the child's home. For Study 3, children from three schools received $10 per interview for up to three interviews held in the evening by telephone. For Study 4, children from six schools received $15 per interview for up to two interviews conducted either in the morning or afternoon at school, or in the evening by telephone. Recruitment procedures were similar for all studies.Participation rates were 73% (n=635) for Study 1, 57% (n=432) for Study 2, 66% (n=158) for Study 3, and 71% (n=296) for Study 4. Logistic regression was used to determine whether study (1, 2, 3, 4), race (black, white), or gender (male, female) were significant predictors of participation (agreed, denied). The results indicated that study (p<0.0001), race (p=0.0198), and gender (p=0.0188) were significant predictors, however, no two-factor interactions among these effects were significant. Post hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni adjustment indicated that agreement to participate for Study 2 was lower (p<0.0001) than that for Studies 1, 3, and 4, which did not differ. Agreement to participate across all four studies was higher for black (69%) than white (63%; p=0.0054) children and for females (69%) than males (64%; p=0.0209). Schools provide a natural environment for nutrition research because school foodservice programs feed millions of children one or two meals (breakfast and/or lunch) each school day. Observations of children eating school meals provide a convenient and relatively unobtrusive means of validating children's dietary recalls. Thus, at some point, most child nutrition professionals are likely to be involved in research either directly (i.e. by conducting studies themselves) or indirectly (i.e. by allowing others access to their school cafeterias to collect data).This paper references the following data: class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc" id="L1">. Similarities and Differences in the Designs for Each of the Four Studies.>Table 1Similarities and Differences in the Designs for Each of the Four Studies
机译:联邦政策鼓励研究人员将儿童纳入研究。因此,重要的是要报告招募儿童参加学习的经历。本文比较了东南部一个学区进行的四项基于学校的营养研究的四年级学生的参与率。在每项研究中,均观察到儿童在学校进餐(早餐和午餐);就饮食摄入进行了采访;然后称重并测量。对于研究1,来自11所学校的孩子每次面试可获得10美元,最多可在上午在学校进行两次面试。对于研究2,如果晚上通过电话或停在孩子家外的货车上进行一次采访,则来自10所学校的孩子会收到25美元。对于研究3,来自三所学校的孩子每次面试可获得10美元,最多可在傍晚通过电话进行三次面试。对于研究4,来自六所学校的孩子每次面试可获得15美元,最多可在上午或下午在学校或傍晚通过电话进行两次面试。所有研究的招募程序都相似。研究1的参与率为73%(n = 635),研究2为57%(n = 432),研究3为66%(n = 158),参与率为71%(n = 296)用于研究4。使用逻辑回归确定研究(1、2、3、4),种族(黑人,白人)或性别(男性,女性)是否是参与的重要预测因子(同意,拒绝)。结果表明,研究(p <0.0001),种族(p = 0.0198)和性别(p = 0.0188)是重要的预测因子,但是,这些影响之间没有两因素相互作用是显着的。事后用Bonferroni校正进行的成对比较表明,参加研究2的协议比参加研究1、3和4的协议要低(p <0.0001),两者没有差异。黑人(69%)的儿童同意参加所有四项研究的意愿高于白人(63%; p = 0.0054),而女性(69%)高于男性(64%; p = 0.0209)。学校为营养研究提供了自然的环境,因为学校的饮食服务计划每天在上学的日子里为数百万的儿童提供一两顿饭(早餐和/或午餐)。对儿童进食学校餐的观察提供了一种方便且相对简便的方法来验证儿童的饮食记忆。因此,在某些时候,大多数儿童营养专业人员可能会直接(即通过自己进行研究)或间接地(即通过允许其他人进入其学校食堂收集数据)参与研究。本文引用以下数据: class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type:disc” id =“ L1”> <!-list-behavior = unordered prefix-word = mark-type = disc max-label-size = 0- -> 。四项研究中每项研究在设计上的异同。<!-table ft1-> <!-table-wrap mode =“ anchored” t5-> > Table 1 <!-说明a7- ->四项研究中每项研究的设计的异同

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号