首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases >Field assessment of insecticide dusting and bait station treatment impact against rodent flea and house flea species in the Madagascar plague context
【2h】

Field assessment of insecticide dusting and bait station treatment impact against rodent flea and house flea species in the Madagascar plague context

机译:马达加斯加鼠疫背景下杀虫剂除尘和诱饵站处理对啮齿动物跳蚤和家庭跳蚤物种影响的现场评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Bubonic is the most prevalent plague form in Madagascar. Indoor ground application of insecticide dust is the conventional method used to control potentially infected rodent fleas that transmit the plague bacterium from rodents to humans. The use of bait stations is an alternative approach for vector control during plague epidemics, as well as a preventive control method during non-epidemic seasons. Bait stations have many advantages, principally by reducing the amount of insecticide used, lowering the cost of the treatment and minimizing insecticide exposure in the environment. A previous study reported promising results on controlling simultaneously the reservoir and vectors, when slow-acting rodenticide was incorporated in bait stations called “Boîtes de Kartman”. However, little evidence of an effective control of the fleas prior to the elimination of rodents was found. In this study, we evaluated bait stations containing insecticide powder and non-toxic attractive rodent bait for their potential to control rat fleas. Its efficacy was compared to the standard method. The impact of both methods on indoor and outdoor rodent fleas, as well as the human household flea Pulex irritans were analyzed at different time points after treatments. Bait stations did not cause any significant immediate or delayed reduction of rat fleas and increasing the number of operational bait stations per household did not significantly improve their efficacy. Insecticide ground dusting appeared to be the most efficient method to control indoor rat fleas. Both methods appeared to have little impact on the density of outdoor rat fleas and human fleas. These results demonstrate limited effectiveness for bait stations and encourage the maintenance of insecticide dusting as a first-line control strategy in case of epidemic emergence of plague, when immediate effect on rodent fleas is needed. Recommendations are given to improve the efficacy of the bait station method.
机译:Bubonic是马达加斯加最流行的瘟疫形式。在室内地面使用杀虫剂粉尘是用于控制潜在感染的啮齿动物跳蚤的传统方法,这些啮齿动物跳蚤将鼠疫细菌从啮齿动物传播给人类。使用诱饵站是在鼠疫流行期间进行病媒控制的替代方法,也是在非流行季节中的预防性控制方法。诱饵站具有许多优势,主要是通过减少杀虫剂的使用量,降低治疗成本以及将杀虫剂在环境中的暴露程度降至最低。先前的一项研究报道,当将慢效灭鼠药掺入名为“Boîtesde Kartman”的诱饵站中时,在同时控制水库和病媒方面取得了可喜的成果。然而,在消除啮齿类动物之前,几乎没有证据能有效控制跳蚤。在这项研究中,我们评估了含有杀虫剂粉和无毒诱人啮齿动物诱饵的诱饵站控制鼠蚤的潜力。将其功效与标准方法进行比较。在处理后的不同时间点,分析了这两种方法对室内和室外啮齿动物跳蚤以及人类跳蚤Pulex irritans的影响。诱饵站没有引起鼠跳蚤的明显减少或延迟,并且每户增加可操作诱饵站的数量并没有显着提高其功效。杀虫剂地面除尘似乎是控制室内鼠蚤的最有效方法。两种方法似乎对室外大鼠跳蚤和人类跳蚤的密度影响很小。这些结果表明,对于诱饵站来说效果有限,并且当鼠疫流行时,当需要对啮齿类动物跳蚤有效时,鼓励将杀虫剂除尘作为一线控制策略,以防鼠疫流行。提出了改善诱饵站方法功效的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号