首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Intervention Effects for Students With Comorbid Forms of Learning Disability: Understanding the Needs of Nonresponders
【2h】

Intervention Effects for Students With Comorbid Forms of Learning Disability: Understanding the Needs of Nonresponders

机译:学生学习障碍的学生的干预效果:了解无应答者的需求

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this article, we considered evidence from our intervention research programs on whether students with learning disability (LD) in reading and mathematics (comorbid LD) respond differently to intervention, compared to students with reading LD alone (RD) or to students with mathematics LD alone (MD). The goal was to gain insight into whether comorbid disorder represents an LD subtype distinct from RD or from MD, which requires differentiated forms of intervention. Our analysis suggested that students with comorbid LD respond differently than those with MD, depending on the nature of mathematics intervention, and may therefore represent a distinctive subtype. By contrast, students with RD appear to respond to intervention in similar ways, regardless of whether they experience RD alone or in combination with MD. Results also suggest that distinctions between comorbid and single-order LD may depend on whether LD is defined in terms of lower- versus higher-order academic skill. Recommendations for future study are provided.
机译:在本文中,我们考虑了干预研究计划中的证据,即与仅阅读LD的学生(RD)或数学LD的学生相比,阅读和数学学习障碍(LD)的学生对干预的反应是否有所不同单独(MD)。目的是深入了解合并症是否代表与RD或MD不同的LD亚型,这需要不同形式的干预。我们的分析表明,LD合并症的学生与MD合并症的学生反应不同,这取决于数学干预的性质,因此可能代表独特的亚型。相比之下,有RD的学生似乎以类似的方式对干预做出反应,而不管他们是单独经历RD还是与MD结合使用。结果还表明,合并症和单级LD之间的区别可能取决于是否根据低级和高级学术技能定义了LD。提供了以后研究的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号