首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Power and Sample Size Determination in the Rasch Model: Evaluation of the Robustness of a Numerical Method to Non-Normality of the Latent Trait
【2h】

Power and Sample Size Determination in the Rasch Model: Evaluation of the Robustness of a Numerical Method to Non-Normality of the Latent Trait

机译:Rasch模型中功效和样本大小的确定:对潜在性状的非正态性的数值方法的鲁棒性评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) have gained importance in clinical and epidemiological research and aim at assessing quality of life, anxiety or fatigue for instance. Item Response Theory (IRT) models are increasingly used to validate and analyse PRO. Such models relate observed variables to a latent variable (unobservable variable) which is commonly assumed to be normally distributed. A priori sample size determination is important to obtain adequately powered studies to determine clinically important changes in PRO. In previous developments, the Raschpower method has been proposed for the determination of the power of the test of group effect for the comparison of PRO in cross-sectional studies with an IRT model, the Rasch model. The objective of this work was to evaluate the robustness of this method (which assumes a normal distribution for the latent variable) to violations of distributional assumption. The statistical power of the test of group effect was estimated by the empirical rejection rate in data sets simulated using a non-normally distributed latent variable. It was compared to the power obtained with the Raschpower method. In both cases, the data were analyzed using a latent regression Rasch model including a binary covariate for group effect. For all situations, both methods gave comparable results whatever the deviations from the model assumptions. Given the results, the Raschpower method seems to be robust to the non-normality of the latent trait for determining the power of the test of group effect.
机译:患者报告的结局(PRO)在临床和流行病学研究中已变得越来越重要,其目的是评估生活质量,焦虑或疲劳。项目响应理论(IRT)模型越来越多地用于验证和分析PRO。这样的模型将观察到的变量与通常假定为正态分布的潜在变量(不可观察变量)相关。先验样本大小的确定对于获得足够有力的研究以确定PRO中具有临床意义的重要变化非常重要。在先前的发展中,已经提出了Raschpower方法来确定群效应测试的功效,以便在具有IRT模型Rasch模型的横截面研究中比较PRO。这项工作的目的是评估这种方法(假设潜变量呈正态分布)对于违反分布假设的鲁棒性。通过使用非正态分布的潜在变量模拟的数据集中的经验剔除率,可以估算小组效应测试的统计功效。将其与通过Raschpower方法获得的功率进行了比较。在这两种情况下,均使用包含团队效应的二元协变量的潜在回归Rasch模型对数据进行了分析。在所有情况下,无论与模型假设的偏差如何,两种方法均给出可比较的结果。给定结果,Raschpower方法似乎对于确定群体效应检验功效的潜在性状的非正态性具有鲁棒性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号