首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Reading Proficiency and Adaptability in Orthographic Processing: An Examination of the Effect of Type of Orthography Read on Brain Activity in Regular and Dyslexic Readers
【2h】

Reading Proficiency and Adaptability in Orthographic Processing: An Examination of the Effect of Type of Orthography Read on Brain Activity in Regular and Dyslexic Readers

机译:拼写处理中的阅读能力和适应性:拼字阅读类型对常规和阅读障碍者大脑活动的影响的检查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Regular readers were found to adjust the routine of reading to the demands of processing imposed by different orthographies. Dyslexic readers may lack such adaptability in reading. This hypothesis was tested among readers of Hebrew, as Hebrew has two forms of script differing in phonological transparency. Event-related potentials were recorded from 24 regular and 24 dyslexic readers while they carried out a lexical decision task in these two forms of script. The two forms of script elicited distinct amplitudes and latencies at ∼165 ms after target onset, and these effects were larger in regular than in dyslexic readers. These early effects appeared not to be merely a result of the visual difference between the two forms of script (the presence of diacritics). The next effect of form of script was obtained on amplitudes elicited at latencies associated with orthographic-lexical processing and the categorization of stimuli, and these appeared earlier in regular readers (∼340 ms) than in dyslexic readers (∼400 ms). The behavioral measures showed inferior reading skills of dyslexic readers compared to regular readers in reading of both forms of script. Taken together, the results suggest that although dyslexic readers are not indifferent to the type of orthography read, they fail to adjust the routine of reading to the demands of processing imposed by both a transparent and an opaque orthography.
机译:发现普通读者可以根据不同拼字法对阅读的要求进行调整。阅读障碍的读者在阅读中可能缺乏这种适应性。这个假设在希伯来语的读者中得到了检验,因为希伯来语有两种形式的脚本,它们的语音透明性不同。从24位普通阅读者和24位阅读困难的读者那里记录了与事件相关的潜能,他们用这两种形式的脚本执行了词汇决策任务。两种形式的剧本在目标发作后约165 ms处引起明显的振幅和潜伏期,并且这些影响在常规阅读器中比在阅读障碍读者中要大。这些早期效果似乎不仅仅是两种脚本形式的视觉差异(变音符号的存在)的结果。脚本形式的下一个影响是在与正字法处理和刺激分类相关的延迟上获得的振幅上获得的,这些在常规阅读器(〜340 ms)中比在阅读障碍阅读器(〜400 ms)中出现得更早。在阅读两种形式的剧本时,行为测验显示阅读障碍阅读者的阅读能力比普通阅读者低。两者合计,结果表明,尽管阅读困难的读者对正字法阅读的类型并不冷漠,但他们无法根据透明和不透明正字法所施加的处理要求来调整阅读程序。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    Irit Bar-Kochva; Zvia Breznitz;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(9),1
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 e86016
  • 总页数 10
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号