首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Sampling Strategies in Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring: Evaluating How Precision and Sensitivity Vary with the Number of Animals Sampled per Farm
【2h】

Sampling Strategies in Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring: Evaluating How Precision and Sensitivity Vary with the Number of Animals Sampled per Farm

机译:抗菌素耐药性监测的抽样策略:评估精确度和敏感性如何随每个农场采样的动物数量而变化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Because antimicrobial resistance in food-producing animals is a major public health concern, many countries have implemented antimicrobial monitoring systems at a national level. When designing a sampling scheme for antimicrobial resistance monitoring, it is necessary to consider both cost effectiveness and statistical plausibility. In this study, we examined how sampling scheme precision and sensitivity can vary with the number of animals sampled from each farm, while keeping the overall sample size constant to avoid additional sampling costs. Five sampling strategies were investigated. These employed 1, 2, 3, 4 or 6 animal samples per farm, with a total of 12 animals sampled in each strategy. A total of 1,500 Escherichia coli isolates from 300 fattening pigs on 30 farms were tested for resistance against 12 antimicrobials. The performance of each sampling strategy was evaluated by bootstrap resampling from the observational data. In the bootstrapping procedure, farms, animals, and isolates were selected randomly with replacement, and a total of 10,000 replications were conducted. For each antimicrobial, we observed that the standard deviation and 2.5–97.5 percentile interval of resistance prevalence were smallest in the sampling strategy that employed 1 animal per farm. The proportion of bootstrap samples that included at least 1 isolate with resistance was also evaluated as an indicator of the sensitivity of the sampling strategy to previously unidentified antimicrobial resistance. The proportion was greatest with 1 sample per farm and decreased with larger samples per farm. We concluded that when the total number of samples is pre-specified, the most precise and sensitive sampling strategy involves collecting 1 sample per farm.
机译:由于食用动物的抗药性是主要的公共卫生问题,因此许多国家已在国家层面实施了抗微生物监测系统。在设计用于监测抗菌素耐药性的采样方案时,必须同时考虑成本效益和统计合理性。在这项研究中,我们研究了采样方案的精度和灵敏度如何随从每个农场采样的动物数量的变化而变化,同时保持总体采样大小不变,以避免额外的采样成本。研究了五种采样策略。他们每个农场使用1、2、3、4或6个动物样本,每种策略总共采样12只动物。测试了来自30个农场的300头育肥猪的1500种大肠杆菌分离株对12种抗菌素的耐药性。每种采样策略的性能都是通过对观测数据进行自举重采样来评估的。在引导程序中,随机选择农场,动物和分离株进行替换,总共进行了10,000次重复。对于每种抗菌素,我们观察到在每个农场采用1只动物的抽样策略中,耐药率的标准偏差和2.5-97.5个百分位数间隔最小。还评估了包含至少1个具有抗药性的分离物的自举样品的比例,以此作为抽样策略对以前未确定的抗药性敏感性的指标。每个农场有1个样本,比例最大,每个农场有较大样本时,比例下降。我们得出的结论是,当预先指定样本总数时,最精确和最敏感的抽样策略是每个农场收集1个样本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号