首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Amino acid positions subject to multiple co-evolutionary constraints can be robustly identified by their eigenvector network centrality scores
【2h】

Amino acid positions subject to multiple co-evolutionary constraints can be robustly identified by their eigenvector network centrality scores

机译:可以通过其特征向量网络中心度分数可靠地确定受多个共同进化约束的氨基酸位置

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As proteins evolve, amino acid positions key to protein structure or function are subject to mutational constraints. These positions can be detected by analyzing sequence families for amino acid conservation or for co-evolution between pairs of positions. Co-evolutionary scores are usually rank-ordered and thresholded to reveal the top pairwise scores, but they also can be treated as weighted networks. Here, we used network analyses to bypass a major complication of co-evolution studies: For a given sequence alignment, alternative algorithms usually identify different, top pairwise scores. We reconciled results from five commonly-used, mathematically divergent algorithms (ELSC, McBASC, OMES, SCA, and ZNMI), using the LacI/GalR and 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase protein families as models. Calculations used unthresholded co-evolution scores from which column-specific properties such as sequence entropy and random noise were subtracted; “central” positions were identified by calculating various network centrality scores. When compared among algorithms, network centrality methods, particularly eigenvector centrality, showed markedly better agreement than comparisons of the top pairwise scores. Positions with large centrality scores occurred at key structural locations and/or were functionally sensitive to mutations. Further, the top central positions often differed from those with top pairwise co-evolution scores: Instead of a few strong scores, central positions often had multiple, moderate scores. We conclude that eigenvector centrality calculations reveal a robust evolutionary pattern of constraints – detectable by divergent algorithms – that occur at key protein locations. Finally, we discuss the fact that multiple patterns co-exist in evolutionary data that, together, give rise to emergent protein functions.
机译:随着蛋白质的进化,对蛋白质结构或功能至关重要的氨基酸位置会受到突变限制。这些位置可以通过分析序列家族的氨基酸保守性或位置对之间的共同进化来检测。共同进化分数通常按等级排序并设定阈值以显示最高的成对分数,但也可以将它们视为加权网络。在这里,我们使用网络分析来绕开共同进化研究的主要复杂性:对于给定的序列比对,替代算法通常会识别出不同的,成对的最高分。我们使用LacI / GalR和1,6-双磷酸醛缩酶蛋白家族作为模型,对来自五个常用的数学差异算法(ELSC,McBASC,OMES,SCA和ZNMI)的结果进行了协调。计算使用了无阈值的协同进化得分,从中减去了列特有的属性,例如序列熵和随机噪声。通过计算各种网络中心度得分,可以确定“中心”位置。当在算法之间进行比较时,网络中心性方法(尤其是特征向量中心性)与顶部成对得分的比较相比,显示出明显更好的一致性。具有较高中心得分的位置发生在关键结构位置和/或对突变功能敏感。此外,最高中心位置通常与配对最高共同进化得分的位置不同:中心位置通常具有多个中等得分,而不是几个强项。我们得出的结论是,特征向量中心度计算揭示了一种关键的稳健的进化模式(可通过发散算法检测到),该模式发生在关键蛋白质位置。最后,我们讨论了一个事实,即多种模式共存于进化数据中,共同导致新兴的蛋白质功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号