首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparisons of Clinical Outcomes and Prognoses in Patients With Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma by Transthoracic and Transabdominal Hiatal Approaches
【2h】

Comparisons of Clinical Outcomes and Prognoses in Patients With Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma by Transthoracic and Transabdominal Hiatal Approaches

机译:经胸和经腹裂孔方法比较胃食管交界处腺癌的临床结果和预后

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To compare the clinical outcomes and prognoses in patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (Siewert type II/III), by transthoracic and transabdominal hiatal approaches.Siewert II/III gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas patients (334 cases) underwent different surgical procedures at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from July 2007 to July 2012 and were analyzed retrospectively. In total, 140 patients underwent surgery by the transthoracic approach, and 194 patients underwent the transabdominal hiatal approach mainly with radical total and proximal gastrectomy (D2). All patients were followed up by telephone review or by outpatient reexamination until July 2013. The surgically related and clinical outcomes were compared using the χ2 test, t test, Fisher exact test, or nonparametric rank sum test according to different data. The survival curve was drawn by the Kaplan–Meier method and survival analysis used Cox regression analysis.The operative time, length of resected esophagus, number of lymph nodes harvested, postoperative pain scores, postoperative hospital stay, time of antibiotics use, postoperative morbidity, and costs for the transabdominal surgery group were better than that of the transthoracic group. The overall 5-year survival rate was 35.3% and 40.3%, respectively, in the transthoracic and transabdominal surgery groups, and differences were not statistically significant (x2 = 2.311, P > 0.05). The hazard ratio of death for the transthoracic compared with the transabdominal approach was 1.27 (0.93–1.72, P > 0.05). According to tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging, stratification analysis showed that stage III patient overall survival rates were 25.7% and 37.2%, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (x2 = 4.127, P < 0.05). In uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis, the hazard ratio for the transabdominal versus the transthoracic approach was 0.66 (0 43 to 0.99, P < 0.05) and 1.47 (1.05–2.06, P < 0.05), respectively.There were no significant differences of 5-year overall survival in TNM stage I and II of the Siewert II/III adenocarcinoma patients, but improved survival of TNM stage III patients undergoing transabdominal hiatal compared with transthoracic total radical and proximal gastrectomy. The short-term clinical outcomes improved with the transabdominal hiatial surgery group.
机译:通过经胸和经腹裂孔方法比较胃食管交界处腺癌(Siewert II / III型)的临床结果和预后。青岛市附属医院对Siewert II / III胃食管交界处腺癌(334例)进行了不同的手术治疗对我院2007年7月至2012年7月进行回顾性分析。共有140例患者经胸腔入路手术,而194例患者经主要经根治性全胃切除术和近端胃切除术经腹部裂孔入路。所有患者均接受电话复查或门诊复查,直至2013年7月。根据χ 2 检验,t检验,Fisher精确检验或非参数秩和检验比较手术相关和临床结局。不同的数据。生存曲线采用Kaplan–Meier方法绘制,生存分析采用Cox回归分析。手术时间,切除的食道长度,所收集的淋巴结数目,术后疼痛评分,术后住院时间,抗生素使用时间,术后发病率,经腹手术组的费用要比经胸手术组好。经胸和经腹手术组的5年总生存率分别为35.3%和40.3%,差异无统计学意义(x 2 = 2.311,P> 0.05)。经胸与经腹方法相比,死亡的危险比为1.27(0.93–1.72,P> 0.05)。根据肿瘤结转移(TNM)分期,分层分析显示,III期患者的总生存率分别为25.7%和37.2%。差异具有统计学意义(x 2 = 4.127,P <0.05)。在单变量和多变量Cox回归分析中,经腹与经胸方法的危险比分别为0.66(0 43至0.99,P <0.05)和1.47(1.05-2.06,P <0.05)。 Siewert II / III腺癌患者TNM I和II期5年总生存率,但与经胸全根治和近端胃切除术相比,经腹裂孔手术的TNM III期患者的生存率提高。经腹部裂孔手术组的短期临床疗效得到改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号