首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Cognitive Difficulties in Struggling Comprehenders and their Relation to Reading Comprehension: A Comparison of Group Selection and Regression-Based Models
【2h】

Cognitive Difficulties in Struggling Comprehenders and their Relation to Reading Comprehension: A Comparison of Group Selection and Regression-Based Models

机译:挣扎理解者的认知困难及其与阅读理解的关系:基于群体选择和回归模型的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Difficulties suppressing previously encountered, but currently irrelevant information from working memory characterize less skilled comprehenders in studies in which they are matched to skilled comprehenders on word decoding and nonverbal IQ. These “extreme” group designs are associated with several methodological issues. When sample size permits, regression approaches permit a more accurate estimation of effects. Using data for students in grades 6 to 12 (n = 766), regression techniques assessed the significance and size of the relation of suppression to reading comprehension across the distribution of comprehension skill. After accounting for decoding efficiency and nonverbal IQ, suppression, measured by performance on a verbal proactive interference task, accounted for a small amount of significant unique variance in comprehension (less than 1%). A comparison of suppression in less skilled comprehenders matched to more skilled comprehenders (48 per group) on age, word reading efficiency and nonverbal IQ did not show significant group differences in suppression. The implications of the findings for theories of reading comprehension and for informing comprehension assessment and intervention are discussed.
机译:在研究中,较难理解的技能使那些在单词解码和非语言智商方面与熟练的理解者相匹配的问题,使先前难以理解的,但来自工作记忆的不相关信息成为工作中不熟练的理解者的特征。这些“极端”小组设计与若干方法论问题相关。如果样本量允许,则回归方法可以更准确地估计效果。通过使用6至12年级学生的数据(n = 766),回归技术评估了在理解能力分布中抑制与阅读理解之间关系的重要性和大小。在考虑了解码效率和非语言智商之后,抑制是通过口头主动干扰任务的表现来衡量的,在理解上占了很小的显着唯一方差(小于1%)。比较技能水平较低的理解者和技能水平较高的理解者(每组48个)在年龄,单词阅读效率和非语言智商上的抑制作用,在抑制方面没有显着的组间差异。讨论了调查结果对阅读理解理论以及为理解理解和干预提供信息的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号