首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Acculturation and Its Discontents: A Case for Bringing Anthropology Back into the Conversation
【2h】

Acculturation and Its Discontents: A Case for Bringing Anthropology Back into the Conversation

机译:适应及其不满:将人类学带回对话的案例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Anthropologists’ contribution to the study of cultural change is urgent in light of the increasing number of people of different backgrounds who are migrating around the globe and settling in new communities, and the opportunities and challenges that come along with that process. By examining the anthropological literature on acculturation going back to the 1936 Memorandum by Redfield, Linton and Herskovits, this paper reviews and assesses the discipline’s perspective on acculturation, and lays out the case for why it is critical for anthropologists to re-engage the concept. Although other disciplines, particularly psychology and sociology, have dominated the field of acculturation research more recently, they mostly have done so with a narrow focus. While it is important to acknowledge the pitfalls of anthropology’s past study of acculturation, there are important features of the acculturation construct that continue to be relevant. Among these are the study of acculturation as a process that is multidimensional; the investigation of how different kinds of power affect the acculturation process; the impacts of attitudes, actions and policies of the receiving group on how acculturation proceeds; the role of “real history” in understanding processes of acculturation; and the global perspective on these processes. We suggest ways in which anthropologists can reignite the field of acculturation research by engaging with Redfield, Linton and Herskovits’ framework and subsequent anthropological literature.
机译:鉴于越来越多的不同背景的人在全球迁移并定居在新社区中,人类学家对文化变化的研究迫在眉睫,并且伴随着这一过程带来的机遇和挑战。通过回顾雷德菲尔德,林顿和赫斯科维兹的1936年备忘录的人类学文献,本文回顾并评估了该学科对文化适应的观点,并提出了为什么对人类学家重新参与这一观念至关重要的情况。尽管最近其他学科,尤其是心理学和社会学,在文化适应研究领域中占据了主导地位,但它们大多是在狭focus的关注范围内进行的。尽管必须承认人类学过去对文化适应的研究的弊端,但文化适应构架的重要特征仍然是有意义的。其中包括对文化适应过程的多维研究。调查不同种类的能量如何影响适应过程;接受小组的态度,行动和政策对适应如何进行的影响; “真实历史”在理解文化适应过程中的作用;以及这些流程的全球视角。我们建议人类学家通过与雷德菲尔德(Redfield),林顿(Linton)和赫斯科维茨(Linton and Herskovits)的框架以及随后的人类学文献进行互动,重新点燃文物研究领域的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号