首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Moderating Effects of Social Value Orientation on the Effect of Social Influence in Prosocial Decisions
【2h】

Moderating Effects of Social Value Orientation on the Effect of Social Influence in Prosocial Decisions

机译:社会价值取向对亲社会决策中社会影响力的调节作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Prosocial behaviors are susceptible to individuals’ preferences regarding payoffs and social context. In the present study, we combined individual differences with social influence and attempted to discover the effect of social value orientation (SVO) and social influence on prosocial behavior in a trust game and a dictator game. Prosocial behavior in the trust game could be motivated by strategic considerations whereas individuals’ decisions in the dictator game could be associated with their social preference. In the trust game, prosocials were less likely than proselfs to conform to the behavior of other group members when the majority of group members distrusted the trustee. In the dictator game, the results of the three-way ANOVA indicated that, irrespective of the type of offer, in contrast to proselfs, prosocials were influenced more by others’ generous choices than their selfish choices, even if the selfish choices were beneficial to themselves. The overall results demonstrated that the effect of social influence appears to depend on individuals’ SVO: that is, prosocials tend to conform to prosocial rather than proself behaviors.
机译:亲社会行为容易受到个人关于收益和社会背景的偏好的影响。在本研究中,我们将个体差异与社会影响相结合,并试图在信任博弈和独裁者博弈中发现社会价值取向(SVO)和社会影响对亲社会行为的影响。信任博弈中的亲社会行为可能是出于战略考虑,而独裁者博弈中的个人决定可能与他们的社会偏好有关。在信任博弈中,当大多数群体成员不信任受托人时,亲社会人士比亲人更不可能遵循其他群体成员的行为。在独裁者博弈中,三方方差分析的结果表明,与要约本身相比,不论要约的类型如何,亲社会主义者受他人慷慨选择的影响要大于他们的自私选择,即使自私的选择对自己有利。他们自己。总体结果表明,社会影响力的影响似乎取决于个人的SVO:也就是说,亲社会主义者倾向于顺从亲社会行为,而不是自我行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号