首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Assessment of Simple Gait Related Dual and Triple Tests in Predicting the Risk of Fall in Adults Above Age of 50 years
【2h】

Assessment of Simple Gait Related Dual and Triple Tests in Predicting the Risk of Fall in Adults Above Age of 50 years

机译:评估与简单步态相关的双重和三次测试以预测50岁以上成年人跌倒的风险

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Timed UP and Go Test (TUG) is conventionally used as predictor of falls in adults. Routine daily activities include multiple tasks performed concurrently. When two or more tasks (Dual/Triple test) needed to be carried out concurrently, task performance declined at least in one of them. Our study aimed to find temporal and demographic variations in the performance after adding a cognitive, motor or both tasks, while performing TUG, compared to performance during conventional TUG. Sixty randomly selected healthy adults, with age ranging from 53 to 90 years, consented to participate in the study. Each participant underwent six tests (Conventional TUG, Motor TUG, Cognitive TUG, Motor and Cognitive TUG, Visuospatial TUG, Motor and Visuospatial TUG), with time measured in seconds. 6 (10%) had a previous history of fall. Triple test identified the highest number of participants at risk of fall (16.67%). ​One way ANOVA test showed significant temporal variation with the addition of task (p value< 0.0002). There was moderate positive correlation of age with the time taken to perform each test with addition of task. Conventional TUG in itself was found to be most sensitive and specific test to identify fallers. Though dual and triple task tests were also comparable, addition of task to TUG is not a sensitive indicator to identify fallers as compared to TUG.
机译:定时上门测验(TUG)通常用作成人跌倒的预测指标。日常日常活动包括同时执行的多个任务。当需要同时执行两个或多个任务(双/三重测试)时,至少其中一项任务性能下降。与传统的TUG相比,我们的研究旨在发现在执行TUG的同时添加认知,运动或两项任务后,表现的时间和人口统计学差异。随机选择了60名年龄在53至90岁之间的健康成年人,他们同意参加该研究。每个参与者进行六项测试(常规TUG,运动TUG,认知TUG,运动和认知TUG,视觉空间TUG,运动和视觉空间TUG),时间以秒为单位。 6(10%)曾有过跌倒史。三重测试确定了跌倒风险最高的参与者(16.67%)。单向方差分析测试显示出随着任务的增加(p值<0.0002)的明显时间变化。年龄与添加任务后执行每次测试所需的时间呈中等正相关。常规TUG本身被认为是识别跌倒者的最敏感和最具体的测试。尽管双重和三次任务测试也具有可比性,但与TUG相比,将任务添加到TUG并不是识别跌倒者的敏感指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号