首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Behavioral and Emotional Consequences of Thought Listing versus Cognitive Restructuring during Discarding Decisions in Hoarding Disorder
【2h】

Behavioral and Emotional Consequences of Thought Listing versus Cognitive Restructuring during Discarding Decisions in Hoarding Disorder

机译:Listing积障碍舍弃决策过程中思想表述与认知重构的行为和情感后果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An essential criterion for hoarding disorder (HD) is difficulty discarding or parting with possessions, yet few studies have examined reactions to actual discarding behaviors. The present study examined whether individuals with HD differed from non-hoarding community controls (CC) in discarding behavior and emotional reactions to discarding. A second purpose was to examine the course of experienced distress following discarding. A third purpose was to determine whether HD participants responded differently to a simple thought listing (TL) instruction or to a cognitive restructuring (CR) protocol. Participants were asked to decide whether to keep or discard (a) a personal possession and (b) a newly acquired object (magazine). HD participants anticipated more and longer distress and reported stronger attachment motives than community controls, but they did not differ significantly from community controls in actual discarding behavior. TL was somewhat more effective than CR in improving discarding behavior and reducing negative emotions and attachments to discarded objects among HD participants. Reductions in distress were observed for both HD-TL and HD-CR groups. Thought listing may have reduced avoidance of decision-making about discarding or perhaps CR, but not TL, provoked therapeutic reactance. Discarding was not related to reductions in distress or hoarding-related beliefs.
机译:ho积病(HD)的基本标准是难以丢弃或与所有物分开,但很少有研究检查对实际丢弃行为的反应。本研究检查了具有HD的个体在丢弃行为和对丢弃的情绪反应方面是否不同于非收容社区控制(CC)。第二个目的是检查丢弃后经历的困扰的过程。第三个目的是确定高清参与者对简单思想清单(TL)指令或认知重构(CR)协议的反应是否不同。要求参与者决定保留还是丢弃(a)个人财产和(b)新获得的物品(杂志)。与社区控制相比,HD参与者预计会有更多和更长的困扰,并报告了更强的依恋动机,但是他们在实际丢弃行为方面与社区控制没有显着差异。在改善高清参与者的丢弃行为,减少负面情绪和对丢弃对象的依恋方面,TL比CR更有效。 HD-TL和HD-CR组均减少了痛苦。思想清单可能会减少避免做出有关丢弃或可能是CR而不是TL引起治疗反应的决策的可能性。丢弃与减少痛苦或与ho积有关的信念无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号