首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >So it is so it shall be: Group regularities licensechildren’s prescriptive judgments
【2h】

So it is so it shall be: Group regularities licensechildren’s prescriptive judgments

机译:就是这样:团体合法性许可证儿童的规定性判断

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

When do descriptive regularities (what characteristics individuals have) become prescriptive norms (what characteristics individuals should have)? We examined children’s (4–13 years) and adults’ use of group regularities to make prescriptive judgments, employing novel groups (Hibbles and Glerks) that engaged in morally neutral behaviors (e.g., eating different kinds of berries). Participants were introduced to conforming or non-conforming individuals (e.g., a Hibble who ate berries more typical of a Glerk). Children negatively evaluated non-conformity, with negative evaluations declining with age (Study 1). These effects were replicable across competitive and cooperative intergroup contexts (Study 2), and stemmed from reasoning about group regularities rather than reasoning about individual regularities (Study 3). These data provide new insights into children’s group concepts and have important implications for understanding the development of stereotyping and norm enforcement.
机译:描述性规则(个人具有的特征)何时成为规范性规范(个人应具有的特征)?我们研究了儿童(4-13岁)和成人对小组规则的使用做出的判断性判断,他们采用从事道德中立行为(例如,吃不同种类的浆果)的新型小组(希布尔和格勒克斯)。将参与者介绍给合格或不合格的个人(例如,吃了Glerk浆果的Hibble的Hibble)。儿童对不符合项的评价为负面,随着年龄的增长,负面评价呈下降趋势(研究1)。这些影响在竞争性和合作性的团体间环境中是可复制的(研究2),并且源于关于群体规律性的推理,而不是关于个体规律性的推理(研究3)。这些数据提供了有关儿童群体概念的新见解,对于理解刻板印象和规范执行的发展具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号