首页> 外文学位 >Feeling and judgment in Kant: Aesthetic judgment, practical judgment and the creation of beauty in art.
【24h】

Feeling and judgment in Kant: Aesthetic judgment, practical judgment and the creation of beauty in art.

机译:康德的感觉和判断:审美判断,实践判断和艺术美的创造。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the Critique of Judgment Kant claims that judgments of taste are necessary not only for the evaluation of art, but also for its creation. If we take this claim seriously, its consequences lead us to a re-examination of the role of feeling in judgment in Kant's work.;Judgments of taste have two components, an object in intuition that is judged and the "state" of the judging subject. This state manifests as a feeling of pleasure or displeasure. A judgment of taste "compares" the object in intuition with the felt state to which it gives rise. There has been much debate about how to interpret feeling's role in this judgment. Is it a "raw feel" interpreted by means of the context in which it arises, or does it have its own intentionality? I argue that judgments of taste must have a complex intentionality to guide the creation of art. One must be aware of a relationship between the object in intuition and of one's own "state" via feeling, and a 'raw feel' is incapable of supporting this. But this interpretation seems to conflict with Kant's claim that feeling is purely subjective and cannot be a source of knowledge.;I show that Kant's claims about the pure subjectivity of feeling are consistent with an account of intentionality not bound to objects of possible knowledge, and can support an account of judgment under conditions of indeterminacy, where discursive knowledge is not possible. This is possible because the "state" one is aware of in feeling is not passive; it is the state of one's mental (and physical) activity vis a vis an object. Pleasure for example, is the feeling of one's activity "furthered," not mere passive enjoyment.;The pure subjectivity of feeling is not a problem for Kant's account of aesthetic judgment. It is a necessary part of it: Judgments about beauty necessarily take place under conditions of indeterminacy. There is no public criterion for correctness in particular judgments about beauty. This is for Kant the power of beauty. It is in the individual case inexhaustible---our encounter with it, and the conversation it engenders, never concludes.
机译:康德在《审判的批判》中声称,品味的判断不仅对艺术的评价而且对于艺术的创造都是必要的。如果我们认真对待这一主张,其后果将使我们重新审视康德作品中判断中感觉的作用。品味的判断有两个组成部分:被判断的直觉对象和判断的“状态”学科。这种状态表现为愉悦或不悦。品味的判断将物体凭直觉“与”物体产生的感觉状态进行“比较”。关于如何在这种判断中解释感觉的作用,存在很多争论。它是通过其出现的上下文来解释的“原始感觉”,还是它具有自己的意图?我认为,品味的判断必须具有复杂的意图来指导艺术创作。必须通过感觉意识到直觉对象与自己的“状态”之间的关系,而“原始感觉”无法支持这种关系。但是这种解释似乎与康德关于感觉纯粹是主观的并且不能成为知识的来源的主张相矛盾。我证明了康德关于感觉的纯粹主观性的主张与对意向性的说明是一致的,而这种意向性并不局限于可能的知识的客体,并且可以在不确定性条件下支持判断的说明,在这种情况下不可能有话语知识。这是可能的,因为人们意识到的“状态”不是消极的。它是一个人相对于一个对象的精神(和身体)活动的状态。例如,快乐是一个人“活动”的感觉,而不仅仅是被动的享受。感觉的纯粹主观性并不是康德对审美判断的考虑。它是其中必不可少的部分:关于美的判断必定是在不确定的条件下进行的。没有关于正确性的公开标准,特别是关于美感的判断。这是康德美丽的力量。在个别情况下,这是取之不尽用之不竭的-我们与之的遭遇以及由此引发的对话永远不会结束。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cannon, Joseph Eugene.;

  • 作者单位

    Northwestern University.;

  • 授予单位 Northwestern University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 291 p.
  • 总页数 291
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:40:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号