首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Cognitive Parent and Teacher Rating Measures of Executive Functioning: Shared and Unique Influences on School Achievement
【2h】

Cognitive Parent and Teacher Rating Measures of Executive Functioning: Shared and Unique Influences on School Achievement

机译:执行功能的认知家长和教师评分标准:对学校成绩的共同和独特影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Very little is known about the relative influence of cognitive performance-based executive functioning (EF) measures and behavioral EF ratings in explaining differences in children's school achievement. This study examined the shared and unique influence of these different EF measures on math and spelling outcome for a sample of 84 first and second graders. Parents and teachers completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF), and children were tested with computer-based performance tests from the Amsterdam Neuropsychological Tasks (ANT). Mixed-model hierarchical regression analyses, including intelligence level and age, showed that cognitive performance and teacher's ratings of working memory and shifting concurrently explained differences in spelling. However, teacher's behavioral EF ratings did not explain any additional variance in math outcome above cognitive EF performance. Parent's behavioral EF ratings did not add any unique information for either outcome measure. This study provides support for the ecological validity of performance- and teacher rating-based EF measures, and shows that both measures could have a complementary role in identifying EF processes underlying spelling achievement problems. The early identification of strengths and weaknesses of a child's working memory and shifting capabilities, might help teachers to broaden their range of remedial intervention options to optimize school achievement.
机译:关于基于认知表现的执行功能(EF)措施和行为EF等级在解释儿童学业成绩差异方面的相对影响知之甚少。这项研究针对84位一年级和二年级学生的样本,研究了这些不同的EF措施对数学和拼写结果的共同和独特的影响。父母和老师完成了执行功能的行为评定量表(BRIEF),并且对儿童进行了基于阿姆斯特丹神经心理学任务(ANT)的基于计算机的性能测试。包括智力水平和年龄在内的混合模型层次回归分析表明,认知表现和教师对工作记忆和移位的评价同时解释了拼写差异。但是,教师的行为EF评分并不能解释超出认知EF表现的数学结果的任何其他差异。父母的行为EF评分均未为任何一项结果量度添加任何唯一信息。这项研究为基于绩效和教师评分的EF措施的生态有效性提供了支持,并表明这两种措施在识别潜在的拼写成就问题的EF过程中可能具有互补作用。及早发现孩子的工作记忆和转移能力的优缺点,可能有助于教师扩大他们的补救干预选择范围,以优化学校成绩。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号