首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Transgender-inclusive measures of sex/gender for population surveys: Mixed-methods evaluation and recommendations
【2h】

Transgender-inclusive measures of sex/gender for population surveys: Mixed-methods evaluation and recommendations

机译:人口调查中跨性别的性别/性别衡量方法:混合方法评估和建议

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Given that an estimated 0.6% of the U.S. population is transgender (trans) and that large health disparities for this population have been documented, government and research organizations are increasingly expanding measures of sex/gender to be trans inclusive. Options suggested for trans community surveys, such as expansive check-all-that-apply gender identity lists and write-in options that offer maximum flexibility, are generally not appropriate for broad population surveys. These require limited questions and a small number of categories for analysis. Limited evaluation has been undertaken of trans-inclusive population survey measures for sex/gender, including those currently in use. Using an internet survey and follow-up of 311 participants, and cognitive interviews from a maximum-diversity sub-sample (n = 79), we conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of two existing measures: a two-step question developed in the United States and a multidimensional measure developed in Canada. We found very low levels of item missingness, and no indicators of confusion on the part of cisgender (non-trans) participants for both measures. However, a majority of interview participants indicated problems with each question item set. Agreement between the two measures in assessment of gender identity was very high (K = 0.9081), but gender identity was a poor proxy for other dimensions of sex or gender among trans participants. Issues to inform measure development or adaptation that emerged from analysis included dimensions of sex/gender measured, whether non-binary identities were trans, Indigenous and cultural identities, proxy reporting, temporality concerns, and the inability of a single item to provide a valid measure of sex/gender. Based on this evaluation, we recommend that population surveys meant for multi-purpose analysis consider a new Multidimensional Sex/Gender Measure for testing that includes three simple items (one asked only of a small sub-group) to assess gender identity and lived gender, with optional additions. We provide considerations for adaptation of this measure to different contexts.
机译:鉴于估计有0.6%的美国人口是跨性别(跨性别)的,并且有记录表明该人群的健康差异很大,因此政府和研究组织越来越多地将性/性别的衡量标准扩展为跨性别的。为跨社区调查建议的选项,例如,广泛应用的性别认同清单检查和提供最大灵活性的写入选项,通常不适用于广泛的人口调查。这些只需要有限的问题和少量的分析类别。对包括性别在内的跨性别人口调查措施,包括目前正在使用的措施,进行了有限的评估。通过对311名参与者进行的互联网调查和随访,以及来自最大多样性子样本(n = 79)的认知访谈,我们对两种现有方法进行了混合方法评估:美利坚合众国制定了两步法问题在加拿大制定的国家和多维措施。我们发现,物品缺失的水平非常低,并且在这两种措施中,顺式(非反式)参与者没有混淆的迹象。但是,大多数受访者表示每个问题集都有问题。评估性别认同的两种方法之间的一致性很高(K = 0.9081),但是跨性别参与者中性别认同不能很好地替代性别或性别的其他方面。从分析中得出的可用于衡量标准制定或适应的问题包括:所衡量的性别/性别的维度,非二元身份是否具有跨性别,土著和文化身份,代理人报告,对时间的关注以及单个项目无法提供有效措施性/性别。根据这项评估,我们建议进行多用途分析的人口调查应考虑一项新的多维性别/性别测评方法,其中包括三个简单的项目(一个小组仅要求一个)来评估性别认同和生活性别,与可选的补充。我们提供了使该措施适应不同环境的考虑因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号