首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >In defense of flossing: Part II-can we agree it’s premature to claim flossing is ineffective to help prevent periodontal diseases?
【2h】

In defense of flossing: Part II-can we agree it’s premature to claim flossing is ineffective to help prevent periodontal diseases?

机译:捍卫牙线:第二部分-我们是否可以同意断言牙线对预防牙周疾病无效还为时过早?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Periodontal diseases (PD) are complex, multifactorial disorders. Effective daily plaque control promotes gingival/periodontal health. Recent meta-analyses and other reviews have found inconclusive evidence to support that tooth flossing promotes gingival/periodontal health. Ideally, the claim should have been that, “at present, we do not have high-quality evidence from well-designed randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to determine whether flossing lowers the risk for periodontal diseases.” Rather than “not proven to be effective,” the lay public may now think that flossing is “almost entirely unhelpful and/or unnecessary.” How does the dental community communicate the nuances of this topic? Herein, we examine the key structural issues underlying this area of research. We assert that effective flossing between specific teeth can promote gingival/periodontal health. Further, we explore the nuances of for whom this may be true and untrue, why our evidence is lacking and what can be done to clarify the effectiveness of flossing on clinical outcomes.
机译:牙周疾病(PD)是复杂的多因素疾病。有效的每日斑块控制可促进牙龈/牙周健康。最近的荟萃分析和其他评论发现不确定的证据支持使用牙线清洁牙龈/牙周健康。理想情况下,应该声称:“目前,我们没有精心设计的随机临床试验(RCT)确定牙线是否能降低牙周病风险的高质量证据。”普通民众可能会认为,使用牙线“几乎完全没有帮助和/或不必要”,而不是“没有被证明是有效的”。牙科社区如何交流这个话题的细微差别?本文中,我们研究了该研究领域的关键结构问题。我们断言特定牙齿之间的有效牙线可以促进牙龈/牙周健康。此外,我们探讨了对于谁可能是正确的和不正确的那些细微差别,为什么缺乏我们的证据以及可以采取哪些措施来澄清牙线对临床结果的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号