首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >ARE PROTOCOLS FOR MEDICATION HOLDS SUFFICIENT FOR SKIN PRICK TESTING FOR OLDER ADULTS WITH ASTHMA?
【2h】

ARE PROTOCOLS FOR MEDICATION HOLDS SUFFICIENT FOR SKIN PRICK TESTING FOR OLDER ADULTS WITH ASTHMA?

机译:老年气喘病患者的皮肤点刺药是否足以用于药物治疗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Allergy skin prick testing (SPT) is commonly performed during the work-up of allergic asthma. We examined a cohort of older asthmatics who underwent allergy SPT following a standardized medication hold protocol in use at the University of Louisville. The protocol attempts to address the impact concurrent medication use has on skin prick test outcomes and are aimed at medications with anti-histaminic or anti-inflammatory activity. It is well documented that immune-senescence is common with advanced age. We were surprised to find a disproportionately low number of subjects with positive skin prick tests in our older aged asthmatics. This led us to explore the idea that additional medications which were not withheld by protocol (e.g., not typically recognized as suppressing immune function or allergy reactions) may effect skin prick interpretations. In one case, for example, a muscle relaxant related to amitriptyline was not held, although amitriptyline itself is typically withheld for 5 days prior to testing. Also, opioids and benzodiazepines have some immunosuppressive activity, yet are not singled out for withholding per SPT protocol. Given that older adults tend to have higher rates of both intra and inter-class polypharmacy that aim to treat comorbid conditions outside of asthma and allergy, we have looked at the potential role these medications play with this surprisingly low rate of negative allergy testing results. Our findings suggest that additional studies are needed to further understand the potential role additional classes of medications commonly used in older adults may play with interfering with skin prick testing protocols.
机译:过敏性皮肤点刺试验(SPT)通常在过敏性哮喘的检查过程中进行。我们检查了一群年龄较大的哮喘患者,他们在路易斯维尔大学使用了标准化的药物保存方案后经历了过敏性SPT。该协议试图解决同时使用药物对皮肤点刺试验结果的影响,并针对具有抗组胺或抗炎活性的药物。已有文献证明,免疫衰老在高龄者中很常见。我们惊讶地发现,在老年哮喘患者中,皮肤点刺试验阳性的受试者数量极低。这导致我们探索一种想法,即方案未禁止的其他药物(例如,通常不被认为抑制免疫功能或过敏反应的药物)可能会影响皮肤刺破的解释。在一种情况下,例如,虽然通常在测试前将阿米替林本身保留5天,但并未保留与阿米替林有关的肌肉松弛剂。此外,阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物具有一定的免疫抑制活性,但并未根据SPT规程被单独扣留。鉴于老年人倾向于治疗哮喘和变态反应以外的合并症,而类内和类间多药的发生率较高,因此,我们研究了这些药物在这种变态反应测试阴性率低的潜在作用。我们的发现表明,需要进行更多的研究来进一步了解老年人中常用的其他类别的药物可能会干扰皮肤点刺试验规程的潜在作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号