首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A MULTIFACTORIAL INTERDISCIPLINARY INTERVENTION IN PRE-FRAIL OLDER PEOPLE: RANDOMISED TRIAL
【2h】

A MULTIFACTORIAL INTERDISCIPLINARY INTERVENTION IN PRE-FRAIL OLDER PEOPLE: RANDOMISED TRIAL

机译:易碎老年人的多学科交叉干预:随机试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The study aim was to determine whether an intervention could reduce pre frailty and improve mobility disability. We conducted a single centre, randomised, controlled trial among older people who were pre frail in Sydney, Australia. One group received an intervention targeting the identified characteristics of frailty, while the comparison group received the usual healthcare and support services. Outcomes were assessed by a rater masked to treatment allocation at 4 and 12 months after study entry. The primary outcomes were frailty criteria with reference to the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria, and mobility as assessed by the lower extremity continuous summary performance score (CSPS) calculated from the Short Physical Performance Battery. Secondary outcomes were also assessed. A total of 194 participants (84%) completed the study. Overall, 38% of participants were men and the mean (SD) age was 81.5 years (5.3). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean between group difference in frailty criteria was .062 at 12 months (95% CI -0.24 to 0.36, p=0.7). The change score on the CSPS favoured the intervention group at 4 months (0.11, 95% CI 0.004 to 0.215, p=0.042) but there was no between group difference at 12 months. There were no major differences between the groups with respect to secondary outcomes. This intervention trial for pre frail older people did not show a benefit on frailty of a multifactorial interdisciplinary intervention. The same intervention had positive effects in frail older people and the reasons for the difference are currently unclear. Trial registration: ACTRN12613000043730
机译:该研究的目的是确定一项干预措施是否可以减少体弱多病并改善行动不便。我们在澳大利亚悉尼的年老体弱者中进行了一项单中心,随机,对照试验。一组接受针对弱点特征的干预,而对比组接受常规的保健和支持服务。在进入研究后4个月和12个月,通过对治疗分配掩盖的评估者评估结果。主要结局是参照心血管健康研究标准制定的虚弱标准,以及根据“短期体能表现电池组”计算的下肢持续综合表现评分(CSPS)评估的活动能力。次要结果也进行了评估。共有194名参与者(84%)完成了研究。总体而言,参与者的38%是男性,平均(SD)年龄为81.5岁(5.3)。在意向性治疗分析中,在12个月时,脆弱标准的组间平均值为.062(95%CI -0.24至0.36,p = 0.7)。 CSPS的变化评分在4个月时偏向干预组(0.11,95%CI 0.004至0.215,p = 0.042),但在12个月时两组之间没有差异。两组之间在次要结局方面没有重大差异。这项针对体弱多病的老年人的干预试验并未显示出多学科跨学科干预对体弱的益处。相同的干预措施对衰弱的老年人有积极作用,目前尚不清楚造成这种差异的原因。试用注册:ACTRN12613000043730

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号