首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >COMPARISON OF STATIC BALANCE BETWEEN INSTITUTIONALIZED AND COMMUNITY-DWELLING OLDER ADULTS
【2h】

COMPARISON OF STATIC BALANCE BETWEEN INSTITUTIONALIZED AND COMMUNITY-DWELLING OLDER ADULTS

机译:机构化和社区居住的成年人之间的静态平衡比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Falls are common among older people and are a serious public health problem in this population. Studies indicate that about 30% of people over 65 years who live in the community fall annually. For individuals in nursing homes, 50–66% fall each year. One specific condition for risk of falling is the gait/balance disability. Often, institutionalized older patients have fewer opportunities to independently participate in activities and tasks of daily living, having higher deleterious effects in the physiological losses from aging, compromising gait and balance. There are fewer studies showing the balance by a force platform in institutionalized elderly. The aim of the study was compare the static balance between institutionalized and community-dwelling older. Forty two older volunteers participated in the study (21 community-dwelling and 21 institutionalized). The static balance was assessed using a force platform (eyes open and closed base). The parameters used to measure the subject’s stability were: total path length (cm), mean velocity (cm/s) and 95% of the ellipse area (cm2). The age of participants was 75.4 ± 7.3 for institutionalized and 72.5 ± 7.1 for community-dwelling older (p=0.20). The results showed a significant difference between institutionalized and community-dwelling older: total path length (77.9 ± 25.05 and 52.7 ± 12.59, p=0.0002), mean velocity (2.60 ± 0.84 and 1.88 ± 0.86, p=0.001) and 95% of the ellipse area (6.5 ± 3.3 and 4.6 ± 2.4, p=0.04). The results showed that the static balance assessed by a force platform of institutionalized older is significantly different of community-dwelling elderly, explaining the greater risk of falls of this population.
机译:跌倒在老年人中很普遍,是该人群严重的公共卫生问题。研究表明,居住在社区中的65岁以上人群中,每年约有30%的人每年摔倒。对于养老院中的个人,每年下降50%至66%。跌倒风险的一种特殊情况是步态/平衡能力障碍。住院的老年患者通常很少有机会独立参加日常生活的活动和任务,对衰老,步态和平衡造成的生理损失具有更大的有害影响。很少有研究表明,通过武力平台可以使制度化的老年人保持平衡。这项研究的目的是比较制度化和社区居住的老年人之间的静态平衡。 42名老年志愿者参加了该研究(21名社区居民和21名住院病人)。使用力平台(睁眼和闭眼)评估静平衡。用于测量对象稳定性的参数为:总路径长度(cm),平均速度(cm / s)和椭圆面积的95%(cm 2 )。养老院的参与者年龄为75.4±7.3,社区居住者为72.5±7.1(p = 0.20)。结果显示,在机构化和社区居住的老年人之间存在显着差异:总路径长度(77.9±25.05和52.7±12.59,p = 0.0002),平均速度(2.60±±0.84和1.88±0.86,p = 0.001)和95%的椭圆面积(6.5±3.3和4.6±2.4,p = 0.04)。结果表明,通过制度化老年人的力量平台评估的静态平衡与社区老年人的显着不同,这说明该人群跌倒的风险更大。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(1),Suppl 1
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 355–356
  • 总页数 2
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号