首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Understanding Interest and Self-Efficacy in the Reading and Writing of Students with Persisting Specific Learning Disabilities during Middle Childhood and Early Adolescence
【2h】

Understanding Interest and Self-Efficacy in the Reading and Writing of Students with Persisting Specific Learning Disabilities during Middle Childhood and Early Adolescence

机译:在儿童中期和青春期期间对具有特定学习障碍的学生的阅读和写作的兴趣和自我效能的理解

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Three methodological approaches were applied to understand the role of interest and self-efficacy in reading and/or writing in students without and with persisting specific learning disabilities (SLDs] in literacy. For each approach students in grades 4 to 9 completed a survey in which they rated 10 reading items and 10 writing items on a Scale 1 to 5; all items were the same but domain varied. The first approach applied Principal Component Analysis with Varimax Rotation to a sample that varied in specific kinds of literacy achievement. The second approach applied bidirectional multiple regressions in a sample of students with diagnosed SLDs-WL to (a) predict literacy achievement from ratings on interest and self-efficacy survey items; and (b) predict ratings on interest and self-efficacy survey items from literacy achievement. The third approach correlated ratings on the surveys with BOLD activation on an fMRI word reading/spelling task in a brain region associated with approach/avoidance and affect in a sample with diagnosed SLDs-WL. The first approach identified two components for the reading items (each correlated differently with reading skills) and two components for the writing items (each correlated differently with writing skills), but the components were not the same for both domains. Multiple regressions supported predicting interest and self-efficacy ratings from current reading achievement, rather than predicting reading achievement from interest and self-efficacy ratings, but also bidirectional relationships between interest or self-efficacy in writing and writing achievement. The third approach found negative correlations with amygdala connectivity for 2 reading items, but 5 positive and 2 negative correlations with amygdala connectivity for writing items; negative correlations may reflect avoidance and positive correlations approach. Collectively results show the relevance and domain-specificity of interest and self-efficacy in reading and writing for students with persisting SLDs in literacy.
机译:运用三种方法学方法来了解兴趣和自我效能在不具备读写能力的特定学习障碍(SLD)的学生中,在阅读和/或写作中的作用;对于每种方法,4至9年级的学生完成了一项调查,他们以1到5的等级对10个阅读项目和10个写作项目进行了评分;所有项目都是相同的,但领域有所不同;第一种方法是将主成分分析和Varimax Rotation应用于样本中,这些样本的读写能力有所不同。在被诊断为SLDs-WL的学生样本中应用双向多元回归,以(a)从兴趣和自我效能调查项目的评分中预测识字成绩;和(b)从识字成就中预测兴趣和自我效能调查项目中的评分。第三种方法将调查的评分与在与方法/避免相关的大脑区域中的fMRI单词阅读/拼写任务中的BOLD激活相关联诊断为SLDs-WL的样本中的影响和影响。第一种方法确定了阅读项目的两个组成部分(每个与阅读技巧相关性不同)和写作项目的两个组成部分(每个与写作技巧相关性不同),但是两个领域的组成部分都不相同。多元回归支持从当前阅读成绩预测兴趣和自我效能等级,而不是从兴趣和自我效能等级预测阅读成绩,也支持写作中的兴趣或自我效能与写作成绩之间的双向关系。第三种方法发现与2个阅读项目的杏仁核连通性为负相关,但与5个写作项目的杏仁核连通性为5正相关和2个负相关。负相关可以反映回避和正相关方法。总体结果显示,对于具有持续学习能力的SLD的学生,阅读和写作中的兴趣和自我效能感具有相关性和领域特殊性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号