首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Relations Between Student Procrastination and Teaching Styles: Autonomy-Supportive and Controlling
【2h】

Relations Between Student Procrastination and Teaching Styles: Autonomy-Supportive and Controlling

机译:学生拖延与教学风格之间的关系:自主支持和控制

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Procrastination is a complex problem that can be defined as delaying an intended course of action (despite anticipating adverse consequences). Even when some students have equivalent motivation and skill levels, they tend to procrastinate more frequently than others. Approaches that analyze whether contextual influences may prevent or promote dysregulation processes associated with procrastination are scarce. According to Self-Determination Theory, contextual influences can facilitate self-regulated motivation (e.g., autonomous pursuit of interests or personal goals), if teaching style is autonomy-supportive and guarantees the satisfaction of students’ basic psychological needs for perceived competence, autonomy, and relatedness. Contrariwise, school context can also impede the development of autonomous motivation if teachers frustrate the satisfaction of their students’ psychological needs by recurring to controlling teaching behaviors, such as controlling use of rewards, negative conditional regard, excessive personal control, or intimidation. The goal of the present study was to assess the relations between controlling and autonomy-supportive teaching behaviors, psychological needs satisfaction (of the needs for competence, autonomy, and relatedness), and four distinct measures of procrastination: general procrastination, decisional procrastination, procrastination linked to task avoidance, and pure procrastination. Data based on public university undergraduate students (N = 672) shows that controlling teaching behaviors are associated negatively with psychological needs satisfaction and positively with procrastination. Contrariwise, autonomy-supportive teaching behaviors are positively associated with psychological needs satisfaction and negatively with procrastination. The data obtained is useful for suggesting new lines of research to study the link between contextual influences and the prevention of academic procrastination in view of Self-Determination Theory. Also, our results suggest new pedagogical approaches where teachers can create contextual conditions that help to prevent or reduce procrastinating tendencies.
机译:拖延症是一个复杂的问题,可以定义为延迟预期的行动过程(尽管预期会有不良后果)。即使有些学生具有相同的动机和技能水平,他们也比其他人更容易拖延。缺乏分析情境影响是否可以预防或促进与拖延有关的失调过程的方法。根据自我决定理论,如果教学方式具有自主性,并能保证满足学生对感知能力,自主性的基本心理需求,则上下文影响可以促进自我调节的动机(例如,自主追求兴趣或个人目标)。和相关性。相反,如果教师通过重复控制教学行为(例如控制奖励的使用,消极的条件性照顾,过度的个人控制或恐吓)来挫败学生对心理需求的满足,学校环境也会阻碍自主动机的发展。本研究的目的是评估控制和自主支持的教学行为,心理需求满意度(对能力,自主性和相关性的需求)以及拖延的四种不同度量之间的关系:总体拖延,决策性拖延,拖延与避免任务和纯粹的拖延有关。基于公立大学本科生的数据(N = 672)表明,控制教学行为与心理需求满意度负相关,与拖延情绪正相关。相反,支持自主的教学行为与心理需求的满意度成正比,与拖延情绪成反比。所获得的数据有助于提出新的研究思路,以便根据自决理论研究情境影响与防止学术拖延之间的联系。此外,我们的研究结果还提出了新的教学方法,教师可以在其中创建情境条件,以帮助预防或减少拖延的倾向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号