首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The ‘Real Without Law’ in Psychoanalysis and Neurosciences
【2h】

The ‘Real Without Law’ in Psychoanalysis and Neurosciences

机译:精神分析和神经科学中的没有法律的真实

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this article, we will examine some of Lacan’s concepts on the relation between psychoanalysis and science. The difference that Lacan states between the real for science, which would be entirely governed by laws, and the real for psychoanalysis – a ‘real without law’ – risk to lead to an irreducible separation between the two fields. However, as the article shows, that separation between psychoanalysis and science is not the position defended by Freud and Lacan. Indeed the latest discoveries in the field of neurosciences challenge the traditional conception of the real for science, bringing it closer to the real ‘without law’ that characterizes psychoanalysis. Conceiving the real for science as a real that is opened to contingencies and not entirely governed by laws, is the first necessary step for a new alliance between psychoanalysis and science.
机译:在本文中,我们将研究拉康关于精神分析与科学之间关系的一些概念。拉康指出,完全由法律支配的科学实物与精神分析的实物(“没有法律的实物”)之间的差异可能会导致这两个领域之间不可分割的分离。但是,正如文章所示,精神分析与科学之间的分离并不是弗洛伊德和拉康所捍卫的立场。的确,神经科学领域的最新发现挑战了传统的科学实在观念,使它更接近表征精神分析的真实“无规律”。将科学实物视为对突发事件开放且不受法律完全管辖的实物,是在精神分析与科学之间建立新联盟的第一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号