首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Co-emergence and Collapse: The Mesoscopic Approach for Conceptualizing and Investigating the Functional Integration of Organisms
【2h】

Co-emergence and Collapse: The Mesoscopic Approach for Conceptualizing and Investigating the Functional Integration of Organisms

机译:共生与崩溃:概念化和研究有机体功能整合的介观方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The fall of reductionist approaches to explanation leaves biology with an unescapable challenge: how to decipher complex systems. This entails a number of very critical questions, the most basic ones being: “What do we mean by ‘complex’?” and “What is the system we should look for?” In complex systems, constraints belong to a higher level that the molecular one and their effect reduces and constrains the manifold of the accessible internal states of the system itself. Function is related but not deterministically imposed by the underlying structure. It is quite unlikely that such kind of complexity could be grasped by current approaches focusing on a single organization scale. The natural co-emergence of systems, parts and properties can be adopted as a hypothesis-free conceptual framework to understand functional integration of organisms, including their hierarchical or multilevel patterns, and including the way scientific practice proceeds in approaching such complexity. External, “driving” factors – order parameters and control parameters provided by the surrounding microenvironment – are always required to “push” the components’ fate into well-defined developmental directions. In the negative, we see that in pathological processes such as cancer, organizational fluidity, collapse of levels and dynamic heterogeneity make it hard to even find a level of observation for a stable explanandum to persist in scientific practice. Parts and the system both lose their properties once the system is destabilized. The mesoscopic approach is our proposal to conceptualizing, investigating and explaining in biology. “Mesoscopic way of thinking” is increasingly popular in the epistemology of biology and corresponds to looking for an explanation (and possibly a prediction) where “non-trivial determinism is maximal”: the “most microscopic” level of organization is not necessarily the place where “the most relevant facts do happen.” A fundamental re-thinking of the concept of causality is also due for order parameters to be carefully and correctly identified. In the biological realm, entities have relational properties only, as they depend ontologically on the context they happen to be in. The basic idea of a relational ontology is that, in our inventory of the world, relations are somehow prior to the relata (i.e., entities).
机译:还原论解释方法的衰落给生物学带来了不可回避的挑战:如何破译复杂的系统。这涉及许多非常关键的问题,最基本的问题是:“我们所说的'复杂'是什么意思?”和“我们应该寻找什么系统?”在复杂的系统中,约束属于一个更高的层次,分子的约束及其作用会降低并约束系统自身可访问内部状态的多种形式。功能是相关的,但不是由底层结构确定地施加。当前专注于单个组织规模的方法不太可能掌握这种复杂性。系统,部件和属性的自然共存可以用作无假设的概念框架,以理解生物体的功能整合,包括其层级或多级模式,并包括科学实践在应对这种复杂性方面的方式。始终需要外部“驱动”因素-周围微环境提供的顺序参数和控制参数-才能将组件的命运“推动”到明确定义的发展方向。否定的是,我们看到在诸如癌症的病理过程中,组织流动性,水平的崩溃和动态异质性甚至使得很难找到观察水平来获得稳定的解释以继续在科学实践中使用。一旦系统不稳定,零件和系统都会失去其特性。介观方法是我们对生物学的概念化,研究和解释的建议。 “介观思维方式”在生物学的认识论中越来越流行,并且对应于寻找“非平凡决定论最大”的解释(可能是一种预测):组织的“最微观”水平不一定“最相关的事实确实发生了”。对因果关系的概念也进行了重新思考,这是为了仔细,正确地识别顺序参数。在生物领域中,实体仅具有关系属性,因为它们在本体论上取决于碰巧所处的上下文。关系本体的基本思想是,在我们的世界清单中,关系某种程度上早于关系(即,关系) ,实体)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号