首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Public Health >Testing the Duke Population Health Profile (Duke-PH) in a Sample of Community Health Center Patients
【2h】

Testing the Duke Population Health Profile (Duke-PH) in a Sample of Community Health Center Patients

机译:在社区卫生中心患者样本中测试杜克人口健康状况(Duke-PH)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: Our purpose was to develop and test a brief, self-report, and scorable survey instrument for measuring population health profiles from the individual respondent's perspective. We defined population health as the state of physical, mental, and social well-being of a group of individuals, including determinants of their well-being.>Materials and Methods: Respondents were adult patients in a community health center. Instrument items, an overall scale, and two subscales were developed and evaluated. Reliability was tested by Cronbach's alphas and test-retest correlations; construct validity was tested by correlations between scores and economic and clinical factors; criterion validity was tested by regression analyses for prediction of morbidity and health care utilization by baseline scores; and feasibility was tested by length of administration time.>Results: This was a 2-years prospective study of 450 patients, mostly black non-Hispanics (54%) and Hispanics (29%), many with no health insurance (45%), and poor enough to meet the federal poverty level (73%). The Duke Population Health Profile (Duke-PH) was developed with a 14-item PH scale for overall population health profile and two 7-item subscales, one for social determinants and the other for health determinants. Validity of item selection was indicated by item convergent and item discriminant correlations. Scale and subscale reliability were supported for internal consistency by Cronbach's alphas of 0.63–0.73, and for temporal stability by test-retest correlations of 0.65–0.78. Support for construct validity was shown by the more favorable baseline subscale and scale mean scores for patients able to buy private insurance than for patients unable to afford it. Criterion validity was supported by regression analyses showing that baseline scale and subscale scores predicted both baseline morbidity and 6-months utilization. Feasibility was shown by the mean self-administration time of 3.9 min and mean interviewer-administration time of 5.8 min.>Discussion: The strength of this study is support for Duke-PH reliability, validity, and feasibility in a community health center patient population. The new instrument is unique because it measures both social and health determinants of population health from the perspective of individuals in the population.
机译:>简介:我们的目的是开发和测试一种简短的,可自我报告的,可评分的调查工具,以从单个受访者的角度衡量人口健康状况。我们将人群健康定义为一群人的身体,心理和社会福祉状态,包括其福祉的决定因素。>材料和方法:受访者是社区健康中的成年患者中央。制定并评估了仪器项目,总体量表和两个子量表。可靠性通过Cronbach的alpha和重新测试相关性进行了测试;通过评分与经济和临床因素之间的相关性来检验构建体的有效性;通过回归分析测试标准效度,以通过基线评分预测发病率和卫生保健利用率; >结果:这是一项为期2年的前瞻性研究,涉及450位患者,其中大多数为非西班牙裔黑人(54%)和西班牙裔美国人(29%),其中许多人没有医疗保险(45%),且足以满足联邦贫困水平的贫困人口(73%)。杜克人口健康状况表(Duke-PH)的开发具有14个项目的PH量表,用于总体人口健康状况表和两个7项子量表,一个用于社会决定因素,另一个用于健康决定因素。项目收敛和项目判别相关性表明项目选择的有效性。克伦巴赫(Cronbach's)的alpha值在0.63–0.73之间,支持量表和子量表的可靠性,以实现内部一致性;在0.65–0.78的重测-检验相关性条件下,量表和子量表的信度支持时间稳定性。有能力购买私人保险的患者比没有能力购买私人保险的患者更有利的基线子量表和量表平均得分表明了对结构有效性的支持。回归分析支持标准有效性,回归分析表明基线量表和次级量表得分可预测基线发病率和6个月使用率。自我管理的平均时间为3.9分钟,访谈者的平均管理时间为5.8分钟,这表明了可行性。>讨论:该研究的优势是对Duke-PH的可靠性,有效性和可行性的支持。社区卫生中心的患者人数。该新工具之所以独特,是因为它从人口中个体的角度衡量了人口健康的社会和健康决定因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号