首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Gastroenterology Report >Cannulation time is a more accurate measure of cannulation difficulty in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography than the number of attempts
【2h】

Cannulation time is a more accurate measure of cannulation difficulty in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography than the number of attempts

机译:与尝试次数相比插管时间是内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中插管难度的更准确度量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Cannulation of the common bile duct (CBD) is the initial and sometime challenging step in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedure. Endoscopists often use cannulation attempts and cannulation time to grade cannulation difficulty, but a standard system has yet to be established. The objective of this study was to compare cannulation times with numbers of cannulation attempts, as measures of cannulation difficulty.>Methods: We conducted a prospective study in a tertiary referral center, enrolling 58 patients who were undergoing ERCP for a variety of indications. Cannulation time and the number of cannulation attempts were recorded for each patient. A subset of 14 ERCPs had two observers assessing attempts at cannulation. Cannulation time, number of attempts and inter-observer variability in assessment of attempts were compared and studied.>Results: The degree of agreement between two the methods (cannulation times and number of cannulation attempts) was unacceptable. There were considerable discrepancies between attempt tallies from two observers but the mean difference was statistically insignificant.>Conclusion: The grade of cannulation difficulty for a given ERCP procedure may differ when different methods are used (total cannulation time vs number of attempts); thus, grading by different methods should not be used interchangeably. Cannulation time is a more objective and more accurate assessment tool for grading cannulation difficulty than the number of attempts to cannulate the papilla.
机译:>背景:胆总管(CBD)插管是内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)程序中的初始步骤,有时是具有挑战性的步骤。内镜医师经常使用插管尝试和插管时间来评定插管难度,但是尚未建立标准系统。这项研究的目的是比较插管次数和插管尝试次数,以衡量插管难度。>方法:我们在三级转诊中心进行了一项前瞻性研究,招募了58例接受ERCP治疗的患者。各种适应症。记录每位患者的插管时间和插管尝试次数。 14个ERCP的子集有两名观察员评估插管尝试。比较并研究了插管时间,尝试次数和观察者之间的变异性。>结果:两种方法之间的一致性程度(插管次数和插管尝试次数)是不可接受的。两名观察者的尝试计数之间存在相当大的差异,但平均差异在统计学上不明显。>结论:当使用不同的方法时,给定的ERCP程序的插管难度等级可能会有所不同(总插管时间与数量尝试);因此,通过不同方法进行分级不应互换使用。插管时间是对插管难度进行分级的更客观,更准确的评估工具,其次数比插管乳头的次数多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号