首页> 外文期刊>Gut and Liver >Difficult Biliary Cannulation from the Perspective of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: Identifying the Optimal Timing for the Rescue Cannulation Technique
【24h】

Difficult Biliary Cannulation from the Perspective of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: Identifying the Optimal Timing for the Rescue Cannulation Technique

机译:从后内窥镜逆行胆管癌胰腺炎的角度来看困难的胆管插管:识别救援工艺的最佳时间

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background/Aims Recently, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) proposed criteria for “difficult biliary cannulation” during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This study aimed to investigate the clinical relevance of the ESGE criteria from the perspective of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Methods An ERCP database was prospectively maintained between November 2014 and December 2015 across six teaching hospitals in South Korea. The ESGE criteria (biliary cannulation time, the number of cannulation attempts, and inadvertent pancreatic duct [PD] manipulation) were recorded in this database as well as other technical factors. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for PEP. Then, the PEP prediction model was investigated using decision tree analysis. Results We analyzed 1,067 consecutive patients with na?ve papilla. The overall rate of PEP was 6.6%. Multivariate analysis revealed that female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.860; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.124 to 3.078), a selective biliary cannulation duration &5 minutes (OR, 3.282; 95% CI, 1.641 to 6.566), and inadvertent PD manipulation (OR, 2.614; 95% CI, 1.480 to 4.617) were significant factors affecting PEP. Decision tree analysis revealed that biliary cannulation time (χ ~(2)=49.857, p&0.001) and inadvertent PD manipulation (χ ~(2)=8.556, p=0.010) were decisive factors. PEP occurred in 3.9%, 11.8%, and 16.2% of patients with biliary cannulation duration lasting 3 to 5 minutes, &5 minutes, and &5 minutes with inadvertent PD manipulation, respectively. Conclusions Biliary cannulation time and inadvertent PD manipulation could be relevant indicators of PEP, and 5 minutes might be used as a cutoff value for the implementation of the rescue cannulation technique. (Gut Liver 2021;15-465)
机译:背景/目的近来,欧洲胃肠内镜内窥镜(ESGE)提出了“困难胆汁插管”的标准,用于内窥镜逆行胆管胰岛素(ERCP)。本研究旨在调查ESGE标准从ERCP后胰腺炎(PEP)的角度的临床相关性。方法对韩国的六名教学医院于2014年11月至2015年12月期间,欧洲经组数据库在2014年11月至2015年12月之间进行了潜在的。在该数据库中记录了EEGE标准(胆汁插管时间,插管尝试的数量,插管尝试的数量和无意的胰管[PD]操纵)以及其他技术因素。 Logistic回归分析用于识别PEP的风险因素。然后,使用决策树分析研究了PEP预测模型。结果我们分析了1,067名连续患有Na?Ve Papilla的患者。 PEP的总体率为6.6%。多变量分析显示女性(差异[或],1.860; 95%置信区间[CI],1.124至3.078),一种选择性胆道插管持续时间& 5分钟(或3.282; 95%CI,1.641至1.641 6.566)和无意的PD操纵(或2.614; 95%CI,1.480至4.617)是影响PEP的重要因素。决策树分析显示胆汁插管时间(χ〜(2)= 49.857,P& 0.001)和无意的PD操纵(χ〜(2)= 8.556,P = 0.010)是决定性因素。 PEP发生在3.9%,11.8%和16.2%的胆汁插管持续时间的患者持续3至5分钟,& 5分钟,和& 5分钟,分别与无意的PD操纵5分钟。结论胆道插管时间和无意的PD操纵可以是PEP的相关指标,5分钟可能用作实施救援工艺技术的截止值。 (GUT肝2021; 15-465)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号