首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience >Neural activity during affect labeling predicts expressive writing effects on well-being: GLM and SVM approaches
【2h】

Neural activity during affect labeling predicts expressive writing effects on well-being: GLM and SVM approaches

机译:情感标记过程中的神经活动预测对幸福感的表达作用:GLM和SVM方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Affect labeling (putting feelings into words) is a form of incidental emotion regulation that could underpin some benefits of expressive writing (i.e. writing about negative experiences). Here, we show that neural responses during affect labeling predicted changes in psychological and physical well-being outcome measures 3 months later. Furthermore, neural activity of specific frontal regions and amygdala predicted those outcomes as a function of expressive writing. Using supervised learning (support vector machines regression), improvements in four measures of psychological and physical health (physical symptoms, depression, anxiety and life satisfaction) after an expressive writing intervention were predicted with an average of 0.85% prediction error [root mean square error (RMSE) %]. The predictions were significantly more accurate with machine learning than with the conventional generalized linear model method (average RMSE: 1.3%). Consistent with affect labeling research, right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (RVLPFC) and amygdalae were top predictors of improvement in the four outcomes. Moreover, RVLPFC and left amygdala predicted benefits due to expressive writing in satisfaction with life and depression outcome measures, respectively. This study demonstrates the substantial merit of supervised machine learning for real-world outcome prediction in social and affective neuroscience.
机译:情感标签(将感觉转化为语言)是一种偶然的情绪调节形式,可以巩固表达性写作(即有关负面经历的写作)的某些好处。在这里,我们表明,在情感标签过程中的神经反应可预测3个月后心理和身体健康结果指标的变化。此外,特定额叶区域和杏仁核的神经活动预测了这些结果与表达能力的关系。使用监督学习(支持向量机回归),预测表达性写作干预后心理和身体健康的四种测量指标(身体症状,抑郁,焦虑和生活满意度)的改善,平均预测误差为0.85%[均方根误差] (RMSE)%]。与传统的广义线性模型方法(平均RMSE:1.3%)相比,机器学习的预测要准确得多。与影响标签研究一致,右前外侧前额叶皮层(RVLPFC)和杏仁核是四个结果改善的主要预测指标。此外,RVLPFC和左杏仁核分别预测了受益于生活和抑郁结局指标的富有表现力的写作所带来的好处。这项研究证明了在社会和情感神经科学中,有监督的机器学习对于实际结果预测的实质性优点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号