首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Food Science Nutrition >Feasibility and acceptability of food‐based complementary feeding recommendations using Trials of Improved Practices among poor families in rural Eastern and Western Uganda
【2h】

Feasibility and acceptability of food‐based complementary feeding recommendations using Trials of Improved Practices among poor families in rural Eastern and Western Uganda

机译:在乌干达东部和西部农村地区的贫困家庭中使用改良做法试验以食物为基础的补充喂养建议的可行性和可接受性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Inadequate complementary feeding practices are a major contributor to stunting among children in Uganda. The WHO recommends the promotion of local food‐based complementary feeding recommendations (FBCFRs) to address nutrient gaps during complementary feeding. This study tested the feasibility and acceptability of FBCFRs, using trials of improved practices (TIPs). Qualitative and quantitative methods were used in a cross‐sectional survey over three household visits. At first household visit, information on socio‐demographic factors and food frequency was collected and FBCFRs introduced. The second household visit assessed the use and barriers related to the FBCFRs, while the third household visit assessed the continued use of the FBCFRs. Focus group discussions and key informant interviews provided the insights into community norms on the FBCFRs. Most FBCFRs were feasible and acceptable. However, caretakers found it difficult to implement a full set of FBCFRs together with the recommended frequencies. Caretakers were more likely to try and continue using FBCFRs that had familiar methods of preparation and commonly used ingredients. Seasonality and cost were major barriers to use. Through TIPs, mothers demonstrated that they are open to try new ways of improving their children's nutrition.
机译:补充喂养方法不足是乌干达儿童发育迟缓的主要原因。世界卫生组织建议促进当地以食物为基础的补充喂养建议(FBCFR),以解决补充喂养期间的营养缺口。这项研究使用改进措施(TIP)的试验测试了FBCFR的可行性和可接受性。在三个家庭访问的横断面调查中使用了定性和定量方法。首次家庭访问时,收集了有关社会人口统计学因素和食物频率的信息,并引入了FBCFR。第二次家庭访问评估了FBCFR的使用和障碍,而第三次家庭访问评估了FBCFR的持续使用。焦点小组讨论和主要的知情人访谈提供了有关FBCFR社区规范的见解。大多数FBCFR都是可行且可以接受的。但是,看护者发现很难将全套FBCFR与推荐频率一起实施。护理人员更有可能尝试并继续使用具有熟悉的制备方法和常用成分的FBCFR。季节性和成本是使用的主要障碍。母亲通过TIP证明了他们愿意尝试改善孩子营养的新方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号