首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Neurophysiology >Different target-discrimination times can be followed by the same saccade-initiation timing in different stimulus conditions during visual searches
【2h】

Different target-discrimination times can be followed by the same saccade-initiation timing in different stimulus conditions during visual searches

机译:在视觉搜索期间在不同刺激条件下相同的扫视开始时间可以跟随不同的目标辨别时间

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The neuronal processes that underlie visual searches can be divided into two stages: target discrimination and saccade preparation/generation. This predicts that the length of time of the prediscrimination stage varies according to the search difficulty across different stimulus conditions, whereas the length of the latter postdiscrimination stage is stimulus invariant. However, recent studies have suggested that the length of the postdiscrimination interval changes with different stimulus conditions. To address whether and how the visual stimulus affects determination of the postdiscrimination interval, we recorded single-neuron activity in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) when monkeys (Macaca fuscata) performed a color-singleton search involving four stimulus conditions that differed regarding luminance (Bright vs. Dim) and target-distractor color similarity (Easy vs. Difficult). We specifically focused on comparing activities between the Bright-Difficult and Dim-Easy conditions, in which the visual stimuli were considerably different, but the mean reaction times were indistinguishable. This allowed us to examine the neuronal activity when the difference in the degree of search speed between different stimulus conditions was minimal. We found that not only prediscrimination but also postdiscrimination intervals varied across stimulus conditions: the postdiscrimination interval was longer in the Dim-Easy condition than in the Bright-Difficult condition. Further analysis revealed that the postdiscrimination interval might vary with stimulus luminance. A computer simulation using an accumulation-to-threshold model suggested that the luminance-related difference in visual response strength at discrimination time could be the cause of different postdiscrimination intervals.
机译:视觉搜索基础的神经元过程可以分为两个阶段:目标识别和扫视准备/生成。这预示着,在不同的刺激条件下,区分前阶段的时间长度会根据搜索难度而变化,而后者的区分后阶段的时间长度是刺激不变的。然而,最近的研究表明,区分后间隔的长度随刺激条件的不同而变化。为了解决视觉刺激是否以及如何影响辨别后间隔的确定,我们在猴子(Macaca fuscata)进行涉及四个关于亮度的刺激条件不同的彩色单一搜索时,记录了顶壁外侧区域(LIP)的单神经元活性。明亮vs.昏暗)和目标干扰物颜色相似度(容易vs.困难)。我们特别着重于比较明亮困难和昏暗容易条件之间的活动,在明亮和困难条件下,视觉刺激有很大不同,但平均反应时间却无法区分。当不同刺激条件之间的搜索速度差异最小时,这使我们能够检查神经元活动。我们发现,不仅刺激前的歧视,而且歧视后的间隔在不同的刺激条件下也不同:在“昏暗”状态下的歧视后间隔要比在“明亮-困难”条件下的更长。进一步的分析表明,鉴别后间隔可能随刺激亮度而变化。使用累积到阈值模型的计算机模拟表明,在识别时视觉响应强度中与亮度相关的差异可能是造成不同的区分后间隔的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号