首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Molecular and Clinical Oncology >Comparison of two different standards of care in detecting malignant thyroid nodules using thyroid fine-needle aspiration
【2h】

Comparison of two different standards of care in detecting malignant thyroid nodules using thyroid fine-needle aspiration

机译:甲状腺细针抽吸术检测恶性甲状腺结节的两种不同护理标准的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of the present study was to verify the optimal method to obtain enough fine-needle aspiration (FNA) materials for detecting thyroid malignancy. A prospective study was performed by comparing two different regional standards of care. In one group a traditional FNA method mainly used in Asian countries, including China, was performed in which a single pass of a 22-G needle was applied with or without aspiration. In the other group, the method mainly used in Western countries was performed in which three passes of a 25-G needle with non-aspiration were undertaken for thyroid nodules. The study included 718 thyroid nodules from 695 patients. These nodules were allocated for three different methods of performing thyroid FNA. There were 332 thyroid nodules subjected to the traditional Asian FNA method using a 22-G needle with aspiration for 142 nodules and non-aspiration for 190 nodules. FNA using the Western method was performed with three passes of non-aspiration using 25 G for 386 nodules. All the FNAs were performed with the guidance of ultrasound. The components of the nodules were documented. All the samples were reported using the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Among the 22 G group, the non-diagnostic rate in the aspiration group was as high as 76.76%, which was significantly higher than 44.21% in the non-aspiration group (P<0.01). For the non-aspiration group, the non-diagnostic rate in the 25 G group was 34.97%, which was significantly lower than 44.21% in the 22 G group. In general, the non-diagnostic rate for the 25-G needle was 34.97%, which was significantly lower than 58.13% in all the 22 G groups. For the solid and mixed nodules, the non-diagnostic rate was lower in the 25-G needle group compared to the 22 G groups with statistical significance. The non-aspiration method using a 25-G needle with multiple passes can result in a higher diagnostic rate for thyroid FNA.
机译:本研究的目的是验证最佳方法,以获得足够的细针穿刺(FNA)材料来检测甲状腺恶性肿瘤。通过比较两种不同的区域护理标准进行了前瞻性研究。在一组中,执行了一种主要在亚洲国家(包括中国)中使用的传统FNA方法,其中一次通过或不进行抽吸都使用了22 G针。在另一组中,进行了主要在西方国家使用的方法,其中对甲状腺结节进行了三通25 G针无抽吸的检查。该研究纳入了来自695名患者的718个甲状腺结节。这些结节被分配用于执行甲状腺FNA的三种不同方法。 332例甲状腺结节接受了传统的亚洲FNA方法,使用22-G针抽吸142个结节,不抽吸190个结节。使用Western方法进行的FNA进行了3次非抽吸操作,其中25个G用于386个结节。所有的FNA均在超声的指导下进行。结节的成分已记录在案。使用用于报告甲状腺细胞病理学的Bethesda系统报告所有样品。在22 G组中,误吸组的误诊率高达76.76%,明显高于不误吸组的44.21%(P <0.01)。对于非抽吸组,25 G组的非诊断率是34.97%,显着低于22 G组的44.21%。通常,25 G针的非诊断率为34.97%,明显低于所有22 G组的58.13%。对于固态结节和混合结节,与22 G组相比,25 G针组的非诊断率更低。使用25 G针多次穿刺的非抽吸方法可以提高甲状腺FNA的诊断率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号