首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >The mechanism of short-term monocular deprivation is not simple: separate effects on parallel and cross-oriented dichoptic masking
【2h】

The mechanism of short-term monocular deprivation is not simple: separate effects on parallel and cross-oriented dichoptic masking

机译:短期单眼剥夺的机制并不简单:对平行和交叉定向两向掩蔽的单独影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Short-term deprivation of the input to one eye increases the strength of its influence on visual perception. This effect was first demonstrated using a binocular rivalry task. Incompatible stimuli are shown to the two eyes, and their competition for perceptual dominance is then measured. Further studies used a combination task, which measures the contribution of each eye to a fused percept. Both tasks show an effect of deprivation, but there have been inconsistencies between them. This suggests that the deprivation causes multiple effects. We used dichoptic masking to explore this possibility. We measured the contrast threshold for detecting a grating stimulus presented to the target eye. Thresholds were elevated when a parallel or cross-oriented grating mask was presented to the other eye. This masking effect was reduced by depriving the target eye for 150 minutes. We tested fourteen subjects with normal vision, and found individual differences in the magnitude of this reduction. Comparing the reduction found in each subject between the two masks (parallel vs. cross-oriented), we found no correlation. This indicates that there is not a single underlying effect of short-term monocular deprivation. Instead there are separate effects which can have different dependencies, and be probed by different tasks.
机译:短期剥夺对一只眼睛的输入会增加其对视觉感知的影响强度。这种效果首先是通过双目竞争任务证明的。两只眼睛看到了不兼容的刺激,然后测量了它们在感知主导力上的竞争。进一步的研究使用组合任务,该任务测量每只眼睛对融合感知的贡献。这两个任务都显示出剥夺的效果,但是它们之间存在不一致之处。这表明剥夺引起多重影响。我们使用了两耳式掩膜来探索这种可能性。我们测量了对比度阈值,以检测呈现给目标眼睛的光栅刺激。当向另一只眼睛展示平行或交叉方向的光栅掩模时,阈值升高。通过剥夺目标眼睛150分钟,可以降低这种掩盖效果。我们测试了十四名视力正常的受试者,发现这种减少幅度的个体差异。比较两个遮罩(平行与交叉)在每个对象中发现的减少量,我们发现没有相关性。这表明短期单眼剥夺并没有单一的潜在影响。而是有单独的效果,这些效果可以具有不同的依赖性,并且可以通过不同的任务进行探测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号