首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Feasibility and safety of using local anaesthesia with conscious sedation during complex cardiac implantable electronic device procedures
【2h】

Feasibility and safety of using local anaesthesia with conscious sedation during complex cardiac implantable electronic device procedures

机译:在复杂的心脏植入式电子设备手术过程中使用局部麻醉并进行镇静的可行性和安全性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We assessed the feasibility and safety of using local anaesthesia with conscious sedation as an alternative to general anaesthesia during complex and noncomplex cardiac implantable device procedures. We enrolled 279 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac device implantation/replacement at our tertiary/quaternary cardiac specialist hospital during a 17-month study period. Continuous combined intravenous conscious sedation with propofol and midazolam plus fentanyl and local anaesthesia were used for all procedures. Among the patients, 113, 59, 43, and 64 patients underwent pacemaker implantation, implantable cardiac defibrillator implantation, cardiac resynchronisation therapy device implantation, and generator exchange, respectively. The procedural success rate was 100%, with no apnoea or hypoxia episodes requiring therapeutic intervention. None of the patients required conversion to general anaesthesia. The mean surgical duration was longer for complex vs. noncomplex procedures (p = 0.003). The minimum mean arterial pressure during complex procedures was slightly lower than that during noncomplex procedures (p = 0.03). The perioperative (<24 h) mortality rate was 0%, and neither complexity group required tracheal intubation. Only two patients (0.7%) required unplanned intensive care unit admission for further surveillance. Our findings suggest that local anaesthesia with conscious sedation is a safe and feasible option for cardiac device implantation procedures, including complex procedures.
机译:我们评估了在复杂和非复杂的心脏植入设备手术过程中使用有意识的镇静作为局部麻醉替代局部麻醉的可行性和安全性。在为期17个月的研究期间,我们招募了279例连续的患者,这些患者在我们的三级/四级心脏专科医院接受了心脏设备植入/置换。所有过程均使用丙泊酚和咪达唑仑加芬太尼的连续静脉自觉镇静联合麻醉和局部麻醉。在这些患者中,分别有113、59、43和64位患者接受了起搏器植入,可植入心脏除颤器植入,心脏再同步治疗仪植入和发生器更换。手术成功率为100%,无呼吸暂停或缺氧发作需要治疗干预。没有患者需要转换为全身麻醉。相对于非复杂手术,平均手术时间更长(p = 0.003)。复杂手术过程中的最小平均动脉压略低于非复杂手术过程中的(p pressure =(0.03)。围手术期(<24 h)死亡率为0%,两组均未进行气管插管。仅两名患者(0.7%)需要计划外的重症监护病房接受进一步监测。我们的研究结果表明,有意识镇静的局部麻醉是包括复杂程序在内的心脏装置植入程序的一种安全可行的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号