首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Toxicological Sciences >Editors Highlight: Analysis of the Effects of Cell Stress and Cytotoxicity on In Vitro Assay Activity Across a Diverse Chemical and Assay Space
【2h】

Editors Highlight: Analysis of the Effects of Cell Stress and Cytotoxicity on In Vitro Assay Activity Across a Diverse Chemical and Assay Space

机译:编者按:跨多种化学和分析空间的细胞应激和细胞毒性对体外分析活性的影响分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Chemical toxicity can arise from disruption of specific biomolecular functions or through more generalized cell stress and cytotoxicity-mediated processes. Here, responses of 1060 chemicals including pharmaceuticals, natural products, pesticidals, consumer, and industrial chemicals across a battery of 815 in vitro assay endpoints from 7 high-throughput assay technology platforms were analyzed in order to distinguish between these types of activities. Both cell-based and cell-free assays showed a rapid increase in the frequency of responses at concentrations where cell stress/cytotoxicity responses were observed in cell-based assays. Chemicals that were positive on at least 2 viability/cytotoxicity assays within the concentration range tested (typically up to 100 μM) activated a median of 12% of assay endpoints whereas those that were not cytotoxic in this concentration range activated 1.3% of the assays endpoints. The results suggest that activity can be broadly divided into: (1) specific biomolecular interactions against one or more targets (eg, receptors or enzymes) at concentrations below which overt cytotoxicity-associated activity is observed; and (2) activity associated with cell stress or cytotoxicity, which may result from triggering specific cell stress pathways, chemical reactivity, physico-chemical disruption of proteins or membranes, or broad low-affinity non-covalent interactions. Chemicals showing a greater number of specific biomolecular interactions are generally designed to be bioactive (pharmaceuticals or pesticidal active ingredients), whereas intentional food-use chemicals tended to show the fewest specific interactions. The analyses presented here provide context for use of these data in ongoing studies to predict in vivo toxicity from chemicals lacking extensive hazard assessment.
机译:化学毒性可能源于特定生物分子功能的破坏,也可能是由更普遍的细胞应激和细胞毒性介导的过程引起的。在此,分析了来自7个高通量分析技术平台的815个体外分析终点中的1060种化学药品(包括药品,天然产品,农药,消费品和工业化学药品)的响应,以区分这些类型的活动。在基于细胞的测定中观察到细胞应激/细胞毒性反应的浓度下,基于细胞的测定和无细胞测定均显示响应频率快速增加。在所测试的浓度范围内(至少高达100μm),至少2种活力/细胞毒性测定呈阳性的化学物质激活了12%的测定终点中值,而在此浓度范围内无细胞毒性的化学物质激活了1.3%的测定终点。结果表明,活性可大致分为:(1)在一个浓度以下可观察到明显的细胞毒性相关活性的浓度下,针对一种或多种靶标(例如受体或酶)的特定生物分子相互作用; (2)与细胞应激或细胞毒性有关的活性,这可能是由于触发特定的细胞应激途径,化学反应性,蛋白质或膜的物理化学破坏或广泛的低亲和力非共价相互作用引起的。通常将表现出更多特定生物分子相互作用的化学物质设计为具有生物活性(药物或杀虫活性成分),而故意食用的化学物质往往显示出最少的特定相互作用。本文介绍的分析为正在进行的研究中利用这些数据预测缺乏广泛危害评估的化学物质的体内毒性提供了背景。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号