首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Tissue Engineering. Part C Methods >A Comparison of Self-Assembly and Hydrogel Encapsulation as a Means to Engineer Functional Cartilaginous Grafts Using Culture Expanded Chondrocytes
【2h】

A Comparison of Self-Assembly and Hydrogel Encapsulation as a Means to Engineer Functional Cartilaginous Grafts Using Culture Expanded Chondrocytes

机译:自组装和水凝胶封装作为一种手段使用培养的软骨细胞工程化功能性软骨移植的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite an increased interest in the use of hydrogel encapsulation and cellular self-assembly (often termed “self-aggregating” or “scaffold-free” approaches) for tissue-engineering applications, to the best of our knowledge, no study to date has been undertaken to directly compare both approaches for generating functional cartilaginous grafts. The objective of this study was to directly compare self-assembly (SA) and agarose hydrogel encapsulation (AE) as a means to engineer such grafts using passaged chondrocytes. Agarose hydrogels (5 mm diameter × 1.5 mm thick) were seeded with chondrocytes at two cell seeding densities (900,000 cells or 4 million cells in total per hydrogel), while SA constructs were generated by adding the same number of cells to custom-made molds. Constructs were either supplemented with transforming growth factor (TGF)-β3 for 6 weeks, or only supplemented with TGF-β3 for the first 2 weeks of the 6 week culture period. The SA method was only capable of generating geometrically uniform cartilaginous tissues at high seeding densities (4 million cells). At these high seeding densities, we observed that total sulphated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) and collagen synthesis was greater with AE than SA, with higher sGAG retention also observed in AE constructs. When normalized to wet weight, however, SA constructs exhibited significantly higher levels of collagen accumulation compared with agarose hydrogels. Furthermore, it was possible to engineer such functionality into these tissues in a shorter timeframe using the SA approach compared with AE. Therefore, while large numbers of chondrocytes are required to engineer cartilaginous grafts using the SA approach, it would appear to lead to the faster generation of a more hyaline-like tissue, with a tissue architecture and a ratio of collagen to sGAG content more closely resembling native articular cartilage.
机译:尽管对组织工程应用中使用水凝胶封装和细胞自组装(通常称为“自聚集”或“无支架”方法)的兴趣有所增加,但据我们所知,迄今为止,尚无任何研究致力于直接比较两种方法来生成功能性软骨移植物。这项研究的目的是直接比较自组装(SA)和琼脂糖水凝胶封装(AE)作为使用传代软骨细胞工程化此类移植物的方法。琼脂糖水凝胶(直径5 mm×1.5 mm厚)以两种细胞接种密度(每个水凝胶900,000个细胞或总共400万个细胞)接种软骨细胞,而SA构建体是通过向定制模具中添加相同数量的细胞而生成的。在6周培养期的前2周中,向构建体添加转化生长因子(TGF)-β3,或者仅添加TGF-β3。 SA方法仅能以高播种密度(400万个细胞)生成几何上均一的软骨组织。在这些高播种密度下,我们观察到,AE的总硫酸化糖胺聚糖(sGAG)和胶原蛋白合成要比SA更大,在AE结构中也观察到更高的sGAG保留率。然而,当标准化为湿重时,与琼脂糖水凝胶相比,SA构建物表现出明显更高水平的胶原蛋白积聚。此外,与AE相比,使用SA方法可以在较短的时间内将这些功能工程化到这些组织中。因此,尽管需要大量的软骨细胞来使用SA方法工程化软骨移植,但是这似乎会导致更快地生成更透明的类组织,其组织结构和胶原蛋白与sGAG含量的比率更相似天然关节软骨。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号