首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Thorax >Nasal ventilation in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: effect of ventilator mode on arterial blood gas tensions.
【2h】

Nasal ventilation in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: effect of ventilator mode on arterial blood gas tensions.

机译:慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重时的鼻通气:通气模式对动脉血气张力的影响。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND--There are no controlled trials of the use of different modes of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in patients with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study describes the effect on blood gas tensions of four different modes of nasal ventilation. METHODS--Twelve patients with acute exacerbations of COPD were studied (mean (SD) FEV1 0.59 (0.13) l, PaO2 (air) 5.10 (1.12) kPa, PaCO2 9.28 (1.97) kPa, pH 7.32 (0.03)). Each patient underwent four one-hour periods of nasal ventilation in randomised order: (a) inspiratory pressure support 18 cm H2O; (b) pressure support 18 cm H2O+positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 6 cm H2O (IPAP+EPAP); (c) continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) 8 cm H2O; and (d) volume cycled NIPPV. Arterial blood samples were obtained before each period of ventilation and at one hour. RESULTS--Pressure support, CPAP, and volume cycled NIPPV all produced significant improvements in PaO2; there was no difference between these three modes. The change in PaO2 with IPAP+EPAP did not reach statistical significance. None of the modes produced significant changes in mean PaCO2; patients with higher baseline levels tended to show a rise in PaCO2 whereas those with lower baseline levels tended to show a fall. CONCLUSIONS--Although PaO2 improved in all patients there are differences in efficacy between the modes, while the changes in PaCO2 were variable. The addition of EPAP conferred no advantage in terms of blood gas tensions.
机译:背景-目前尚无在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)恶化患者中使用不同模式的鼻间歇性正压通气(NIPPV)的对照试验。这项研究描述了四种鼻通气方式对血气紧张的影响。方法-研究了12名COPD急性加重患者(平均(SD)FEV1 0.59(0.13)l,PaO2(空气)5.10(1.12)kPa,PaCO2 9.28(1.97)kPa,pH 7.32(0.03))。每位患者随机接受四个一小时的鼻通气:(a)吸气压力支持18 cm H2O; (b)压力支持18厘米水柱+呼气末正压(PEEP)6厘米水柱(IPAP + EPAP); (c)8 cm H2O的持续气道正压(CPAP); (d)量循环NIPPV。在每个通气时间之前和一小时内获取动脉血样品。结果-压力支持,CPAP和容积循环NIPPV都显着改善了PaO2;这三种模式之间没有差异。 IPAP + EPAP引起的PaO2改变没有统计学意义。两种模式均未产生平均PaCO2的显着变化。基线水平较高的患者倾向于显示PaCO2升高,而基线水平较低的患者则倾向于降低。结论-尽管所有患者的PaO2均得到改善,但两种模式之间的疗效存在差异,而PaCO2的变化却是可变的。 EPAP的添加在血气紧张方面没有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号