首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London >Freud Jung and Boas: the psychoanalytic engagement with anthropology revisited
【2h】

Freud Jung and Boas: the psychoanalytic engagement with anthropology revisited

机译:弗洛伊德荣格和博阿斯:重新审视了人类学的精神分析学

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Sigmund Freud's and C. G. Jung's turn to evolutionist anthropological material after 1909 is usually seen as a logical progression of their long-term interest in such material. It is also seen that they used this material ignorant of the significant challenges to the evolutionist paradigm underpinning such material, in particular the challenges led by Franz Boas. This paper argues otherwise: that both psychologists' turnings to such material was a new development, that neither had shown great interest in such material before 1909, and that their turnings to such material, far from being taken in ignorance of the challenges to evolutionist anthropology, were engagements with those challenges, because the evolutionist paradigm lay at the base of psychoanalysis. It argues that it is no coincidence that this engagement occurred after their return from America in 1909, where they had come into first-hand contact with the challenges of Franz Boas.
机译:西格蒙德·弗洛伊德(Sigmund Freud)和C.G.荣格(C.G. Jung)在1909年后转向进化论人类学材料通常被视为他们对这种材料的长期兴趣的逻辑发展。还可以看出,他们对这种材料所用的进化论范式所面临的重大挑战,特别是弗朗兹·博阿斯(Franz Boas)所面临的挑战,并不了解。本文另作论证:两位心理学家对这种材料的转向都是新的发展,他们都没有对1909年前的这种材料表现出极大的兴趣,而且他们对这种材料的转向绝不是无视进化论人类学所面临的挑战之所以参与这些挑战,是因为进化论范式奠定了精神分析的基础。它辩称,这种订婚并非偶然,因为他们于1909年从美国返回美国,在那里他们与弗朗兹·博阿斯(Franz Boas)的挑战进行了第一手接触。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号