首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews >Comparison of routes for achieving parenteral access with a focus on the management of patients with Ebola virus disease
【2h】

Comparison of routes for achieving parenteral access with a focus on the management of patients with Ebola virus disease

机译:比较实现肠胃外途径的途径重点是埃博拉病毒病患者的治疗

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundDehydration is an important cause of death in patients with Ebola virus disease (EVD). Parenteral fluids are often required in patients with fluid requirements in excess of their oral intake. The peripheral intravenous route is the most commonly used method of parenteral access, but inserting and maintaining an intravenous line can be challenging in the context of EVD. Therefore it is important to consider the advantages and disadvantages of different routes for achieving parenteral access (e.g. intravenous, intraosseous, subcutaneous and intraperitoneal).
机译:背景脱水是埃博拉病毒病(EVD)患者死亡的重要原因。对于液体需求量超过口服摄入量的患者,通常需要肠胃外输液。外周静脉途径是肠胃外通行最常用的方法,但是在EVD的情况下,插入和维持静脉管线可能是一项挑战。因此,重要的是要考虑实现肠胃外通路的不同途径的利弊(例如静脉内,骨内,皮下和腹膜内)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号