首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Physical Therapy Science >The effects of cognitive rehabilitation on Alzheimer’s dementia patients’cognitive assessment reference diagnosis system performance based on level of cognitivefunctioning
【2h】

The effects of cognitive rehabilitation on Alzheimer’s dementia patients’cognitive assessment reference diagnosis system performance based on level of cognitivefunctioning

机译:认知康复对阿尔茨海默氏症痴呆症患者的影响基于认知水平的认知评估参考诊断系统性能运作

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

[Purpose] The purpose of this study is to apply cognitive rehabilitation according to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients’ level of cognitive functioning to compare changes in Cognitive Assessment Reference Diagnosis System performance and present standards for effective intervention. [Subjects] Subjects were 30 inpatients diagnosed with AD. Subjects were grouped by Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) class (CDR-0.5, CDR-1, or CDR-2, n = 10 per group), which is based on level of cognitive functioning, and cognitive rehabilitation was applied for 50 minutes per day, five days per week, for four weeks. [Methods] After cognitive rehabilitation intervention, CARDS tests were conducted to evaluate memory. [Results] Bonferroni tests comparing the three groups revealed that the CDR-0.5 and CDR-1 groups showed significant increases in Delayed 10 word-list, Delayed 10 object-list, Recognition 10 object, and Recent memory performance compared to the CDR-2 group. In addition, the CDR-0.5 group showed significant decreases in Recognition 10 word performance compared to the CDR-1 group. [Conclusion] Cognitive rehabilitation, CDR-0.5 or CDR-1 subjects showed significantly greater memory improvements than CDR-2 subjects. Moreover, was not effective for CDR-2 subjects.
机译:[目的]本研究的目的是根据阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)患者的认知功能水平应用认知康复,以比较认知评估参考诊断系统性能的变化并提出有效干预的现行标准。 [对象]受试者为30位被诊断患有AD的住院患者。根据认知功能水平将受试者按临床痴呆症评分(CDR)类别(CDR-0.5,CDR-1或CDR-2,每组n = 10)分组,并且每分钟进行50分钟的认知康复一天,每周五天,持续四个星期。 [方法]在认知康复干预后,进行CARDS测试以评估记忆力。 [结果] Bonferroni测试对这三组进行比较后发现,与CDR-2相比,CDR-0.5和CDR-1组的延迟10个单词列表,延迟10个对象列表,识别10个对象和最近的记忆性能显着增加。组。此外,与CDR-1组相比,CDR-0.5组的识别10字表现显着下降。 [结论]认知康复,CDR-0.5或CDR-1受试者比CDR-2受试者表现出更大的记忆改善。而且,对于CDR-2受试者无效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号