首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Advances in Cognitive Psychology >The effect of target context and cue type in a postcue wordpronunciation task
【2h】

The effect of target context and cue type in a postcue wordpronunciation task

机译:目标上下文和提示类型在后提示词中的作用发音任务

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Dallas and Merikle (, ) demonstrated that when participants were presented with a pair of words for over 1 s and subsequently cued to pronounce one of the words aloud (postcue task) semantic priming effects occurred. Humphreys, Lloyd-Jones, and Fias () failed to replicate this postcue semantic priming effect using word pairs that were semantic category co-ordinates. The aim of Experiment 1 was to determine if the disparate postcue task results reported by these researchers could be accounted for by the prime-target contexts or cue types engaging different attentional processes or a combination of these factors. A postcue pronunciation task was used and word pairs presented were taken from an associate-semantic context and a semantic category context. In the Dallas and Merikle condition the line cue flanked the location in which the target word was previously shown. In the Humphreys et al. condition the cue word UPPER or lower was centrally presented and indicated the location in which the target word previously appeared. Results demonstrated that the occurrence of semantic and associate-semantic priming effects under postcue task conditions varied for the two cue types. Experiment 2 investigated if these results were attributable to a between subjectmanipulation of cue type. Using a fully repeated measures design priming effectswere evident for top located targets in both the associate-semantic and semanticprime-target contexts. Experiment 3 used a between subjects design to rule outthe possibility that carry over effects between cue and context conditionscontributed to the postcue task priming effects. Priming was evident for toplocated targets in an associate-semantic and semantic context for the line cue.For the word cue there was priming for top located targets from anassociate-semantic context and a reverse priming effect for top located targetsfrom the semantic context. Possible explanations for the occurrence of primingeffects under postcue task conditions are discussed.
机译:Dallas和Merikle(,)证明,当向参与者展示一对单词超过1 s,随后提示他们大声念出其中一个单词(事后任务)时,就会产生语义启动效果。 Humphreys,Lloyd-Jones和Fias()无法使用作为语义类别坐标的单词对来复制这种事后语义启动效应。实验1的目的是确定这些研究人员报告的不同的事后任务结果是否可以由参与不同注意力过程或这些因素组合的主要目标语境或提示类型来解释。使用了后期语音发音任务,并且从关联语义上下文和语义类别上下文中提取了呈现的单词对。在达拉斯(Dallas)和梅里克(Merikle)条件下,行提示位于先前显示目标单词的位置的旁边。在汉弗莱斯等。条件下,提示词UPPER或更低的词被集中显示,并指​​示目标词先前出现的位置。结果表明,在两种线索类型下,线索任务条件下语义和联想语义启动效应的发生情况有所不同。实验2研究了这些结果是否可归因于受试者之间提示类型的操纵。使用完全重复的措施设计启动效果在关联语义和语义上对于最重要的目标很明显主要目标环境。实验3使用了受试者之间的设计来排除在提示和上下文条件之间传递影响的可能性有助于事后任务启动效果。顶注明显在提示的关联语义和语义上下文中定位目标。对于“提示”一词,可以从关联语义语境和顶部目标的反向启动效应从语义上下文。引发的可能解释讨论了事后任务条件下的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号