首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Advances in Nutrition >Development of the SoFAS (Solid Fats and Added Sugars) Concept: The 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans
【2h】

Development of the SoFAS (Solid Fats and Added Sugars) Concept: The 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans

机译:SoFAS(固体脂肪和糖分)概念的发展: 2010年美国人饮食指南

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The diets of most US children and adults are poor, as reflected by low diet quality scores, when compared with the recommendations of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs). Contributing to these low scores is that most Americans overconsume solid fats, which may contain saturated fatty acids and added sugars; although alcohol consumption was generally modest, it provided few nutrients. Thus, the 2005 DGAs generated a new recommendation: to reduce intakes of solid fats, alcohol, and added sugars (SoFAAS). What precipitated the emergence of the new SoFAAS terminology was the concept of discretionary calories (a “calorie” is defined as the amount of energy needed to increase the temperature of 1 kg of water by 1°C), which were defined as calories consumed after an individual had met his or her recommended nutrient intakes while consuming fewer calories than the daily recommendation. A limitation with this concept was that additional amounts of nutrient-dense foods consumed beyond the recommended amount were also considered discretionary calories. The rationale for this was that if nutrient-dense foods were consumed beyond recommended amounts, after total energy intake was met then this constituted excess energy intake. In the 2010 DGAs, the terminology was changed to solid fats and added sugars (SoFAS); thus, alcohol was excluded because it made a minor contribution to overall intake and did not apply to children. The SoFAS terminology also negated nutrient-dense foods that were consumed in amounts above the recommendations for the specific food groups in the food patterns. The ambiguous SoFAS terminology was later changed to “empty calories” to reflect only those calories from solid fats and added sugars (and alcohol if consumed beyond moderate amounts). The purpose of this review is to provide an historical perspective on how the dietary recommendations went from SoFAAS to SoFAS and how discretionary calories went to empty calories between the 2005 and 2010 DGAs. This information will provide practitioners, as well as the public, with valuable information to better understand the evolution of SoFAS over time.
机译:与美国饮食指南(DGA)的建议相比,大多数美国儿童和成人的饮食质量较差,这反映在低饮食质量得分上。造成这些低分的原因是,大多数美国人过度食用固体脂肪,其中可能包含饱和脂肪酸和添加的糖。尽管饮酒一般不多,但提供的营养却很少。因此,2005年DGA提出了一项新建议:减少固体脂肪,酒精和添加的糖(SoFAAS)的摄入量。促成新的SoFAAS术语出现的是自由卡路里的概念(“卡路里”的定义是将1千克水的温度提高1°C所需的能量),其定义为热量消耗后的卡路里一个人已经满足了他或她推荐的营养摄入量,而消耗的卡路里却少于每日推荐的卡路里。该概念的局限性在于,超出推荐量食用的营养密集型食品的额外数量也被视为任意卡路里。这样做的理由是,如果消耗的营养丰富的食物超过了建议的量,则在满足总能量摄入量后,便构成了过量的能量摄入量。在2010年的DGA中,术语更改为固体脂肪和添加的糖(SoFAS);因此,酒精被排除在外是因为酒精对总摄入量的贡献很小,不适用于儿童。 SoFAS术语还否定了营养密集型食品,其消耗量超过了食物类型中特定食物类别的建议量。 SoFAS模棱两可的术语后来更改为“空卡路里”,以仅反映来自固体脂肪和添加的糖(如果消耗的量超过适量,则包括酒精)中的卡路里。这篇综述的目的是就饮食建议如何从SoFAAS过渡到SoFAS以及如何在2005年至2010年DGA之间将可自由支配的卡路里转化为空卡路里提供历史观点。该信息将为从业者以及公众提供有价值的信息,以更好地了解SoFAS随时间的演变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号