首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>African Journal of Traditional Complementary and Alternative Medicines >Comparison of Efficacy of Neural Therapy and Physical Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain
【2h】

Comparison of Efficacy of Neural Therapy and Physical Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain

机译:神经疗法和物理疗法在慢性下腰痛中的疗效比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the effects of neural therapy, and physical therapy on level of pain, disability, quality of life, and psychological status in patients with chronic low back pain. Patients admitted to the physical therapy and rehabilitation outpatient clinic with the complaint of low back pain of at least 3 months duration. Group 1 (n=27), physical therapy (PT, hotpack, ultrasound, TENS 15 sessions), group 2 (n=33), neural therapy (NT, 1:1 mixture of 20 mg/mL Lidocaine HCl (Jetokain simplex>®) and saline for 5 sessions. For pain, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), for disability Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), for quality-of-life Nottingham-Health-Profile (NHP), for depression, and anxiety, Hospital Anxiety-Depression Scale (HADS) were used before and after the treatment. Mean age was 47.3±11.32 years, symptom time was 13.78±11.98 months. There were no differences for demographic variables between groups. Significant improvements were detected for VAS, RMDQ, NHP-Pain, NHP-Physical activity, HADS for both of two groups after treatment. In addition to these findings, significant improvements were found for NHP-Energy, NHP-Social isolation in NT group. The differences of pre- and post-treatment values of parameters were evaluated for each group. Although there were no differences for VAS, NHP-sleep, NHP-Emotional reaction, HADS between groups, RMDQ, NHP-Pain, NHP-Physical activity, NHP-Social isolation were higher in NT than PT before treatment, the improvements for these parameters were better in NT than PT. In conclusion both of NT and PT are effective on pain, function, quality of life, anxiety, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain.
机译:这项前瞻性研究的目的是评估神经疗法和物理疗法对慢性下腰痛患者的疼痛程度,残疾,生活质量和心理状态的影响。入院物理治疗和康复门诊且因腰背痛而持续至少3个月的患者。第1组(n = 27),物理疗法(PT,热敷,超声波,TENS 15次疗程),第2组(n = 33),神经疗法(NT,20 mg / mL盐酸利多卡因的1:1混合物(Jetokain simplex < (strong>®)和生理盐水治疗5次;对于疼痛,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS),对于残疾Roland Morris残疾问卷(RMDQ),对于生活质量的诺丁汉健康状况(NHP),对于抑郁和焦虑,治疗前后采用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS),平均年龄为47.3±11.32岁,症状时间为13.78±11.98个月,两组间的人口统计学变量无差异,显着改善。治疗后两组均检测到VAS,RMDQ,NHP疼痛,NHP物理活性,HADS,除了这些发现外,NT组在NHP能量,NHP社交隔离方面也有明显改善。评估各组治疗前后的参数值,尽管两者之间没有差异。治疗前NT组的VAS,NHP-睡眠,NHP情绪反应,组间HADS,RMDQ,NHP-疼痛,NHP-身体活动,NHP-社会隔离度均高于PT,NT这些参数的改善优于PT 。总之,NT和PT均可有效治疗慢性下腰痛患者的疼痛,功能,生活质量,焦虑和抑郁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号